MetaMarkets - The European lens on crypto, macro-finance, and regulation.

Epizode

• Why the CLARITY Act Is a Breakthrough - Jacob Robinson | Law of Code: Decentralization vs. Permissionlessness 11.06.2026 38min

  This Episodes Host: Jan Philipp Fritsche — Strategic Director at Oak Security, a Web3 cybersecurity firm pioneering research on economic and systemic risks in decentralized systems. Co-Founder of Bermuda. https://www.linkedin.com/in/janf/ The guest: Jacob Robinson is a lawyer, writer, and host of the Law of Code podcast, where he explores the legal and regulatory questions shaping crypto, blockchain, and digital assets. His work focuses on making complex crypto law topics accessible through in-depth conversations and analysis.https://www.linkedin.com/in/robinson-jacob/ When the politicians change, should the rules change too? In this episode of MetaMarkets, Jan is joined by Jacob Robinson, host of Law of Code, to compare the two frameworks set to define the next decade of crypto regulation: the US Digital Market Clarity Act and Europe's MiCA. The guiding principle throughout is a demanding one; the best rules are those you'd be happy with your enemy enforcing. The two laws were built differently. MiCA started from scratch, trying to predict the problems crypto might create and pre-empt them. Clarity takes hundred-year-old legal principles and adapts them to a technology defined by intermediary-less transfers and pseudonymous accounts. The difference matters: rules built on predictions tend to age badly. On stablecoins, the frameworks diverge sharply. MiCA requires issuers to hold 60% of reserves in banks, making stablecoins dependent on the fractional reserve system, a risk made real by the Silicon Valley Bank collapse. The provocative counter-framing: it's not that stablecoins threaten banks, but that banks threaten stablecoins. Under Clarity, the prohibition on yield loosens, allowing staking, governance, and genuine economic activity to earn rewards. The episode closes on the distinction that defines its second half: decentralization versus permissionlessness. Regulators and much of the industry have conflated the two, a legacy of the "sufficiently decentralized" framing from the DAO Report. The argument here is that permissionlessness and immutability are the properties that actually matter, and the most practical advice in the episode is simple: when meeting a regulator, stop talking about relayers and nonces, and start by asking what they're worried about. The takeaway is a reframing. The fight isn't really about decentralization. It's about whether we build a world where access can't be revoked — and whether regulators can be persuaded to protect that, rather than fear it.
• European Ethereum Institute’s Marina Markezic on MiCA 2, DeFi, and Europe’s Crypto Future 06.06.2026 1h 4min

  European Ethereum Institute’s Marina Markezic on MiCA 2, DeFi, and Europe’s Crypto Future The HostsJan Philipp Fritsche — Strategic Director at Oak Security, a Web3 cybersecurity firm pioneering research on economic and systemic risks in decentralized systems. Co-Founder of Bermuda. https://www.linkedin.com/in/janf/ Jón Egilsson — Former Chair of the Central Bank of Iceland; Co-founder of Monerium, the first company to issue fiat currency on-chain. https://www.linkedin.com/in/egilsson/ The GuestMarina Markezic — Executive Director of the European Ethereum Institute (https://www.linkedin.com/company/european-ethereum-institute/), a Brussels-based nonprofit working on Ethereum policy, public blockchain advocacy, and the broader Ethereum ecosystem. The Institute builds on the work of the European Crypto Initiative and focuses on making sure European policymakers understand the realities of permissionless infrastructure, DeFi, tokenization, and on-chain finance.https://www.linkedin.com/in/marinamarkezic/ MiCA is back on the agenda. The question is whether Europe will use the review process to make crypto regulation more competitive, or whether it will double down on a framework that favors incumbents. In this episode of MetaMarkets, Jón and Jan are joined by Marina Markezic from the European Ethereum Institute to unpack the European Commission’s consultation on what the industry has started calling “MiCA 2.” Marina explains that MiCA 2 is not yet an official legislative proposal, but rather a review process triggered by revision clauses in the original regulation. The Commission is gathering input on what has changed since MiCA was finalized, including DeFi, staking, perpetuals, tokenization, and the treatment of assets that may not fit neatly into today’s categories. The conversation begins with stablecoins, where Jón argues that Europe’s current framework structurally favors banks over non-bank issuers. Under MiCA, non-bank issuers must rely on banks as intermediaries and safeguard a significant share of reserves within the banking system. For Jón, this is not just a technical design flaw but a political choice: Europe must decide whether it wants a competitive market economy for stablecoins or a bank-led system protected by regulation. Marina pushes back on the idea that consultation processes are meaningless. She argues that industry participation still matters, especially because regulators count the number of responses and because many questions can be answered without extensive legal or policy teams. But she also acknowledges that different parts of the consultation carry different political weight. Stablecoins are highly charged because of the European Central Bank’s role and concerns around monetary sovereignty, while areas like DeFi and tokenization may still be more open to technical input. From there, the discussion turns to DeFi. Marina explains why MiCA originally avoided regulating DeFi in detail: the market was still developing, definitions were unclear, and legislators focused instead on centralized crypto asset service providers and stablecoins. The current consultation reopens the question of whether DeFi should be brought into MiCA, left largely outside it, or addressed through lighter-touch measures such as disclosures, self-regulation, or technical standards. Jan argues that “DeFi” may be the wrong framing altogether. The core innovation is not that every application is decentralized from day one, but that finance can be deployed on decentralized infrastructure in a way that is non-custodial, permissionless, and programmatic. He suggests regulators should focus less on decentralization as a binary label and more on three dimensions: decentralization, permissionlessness or non-custodial control, and mutability versus immutability. This leads to one of the episode’s central ideas: perhaps the better term is not DeFi, but “permissionless finance.” Decentralization matters most at the infrastructure l
• Stablecoin Intelligence, Liquidity, and Regulation 11.05.2026 43min

  Jan Philipp Fritsche — Strategic Director at Oak Security, a Web3 cybersecurity firm pioneering research on economic and systemic risks in decentralized systems. Co-Founder of Bermuda.  https://www.linkedin.com/in/janf/ Jón Egilsson — Former Chair of the Central Bank of Iceland; Co-founder of Monerium, the first company to issue fiat currency on-chain. https://www.linkedin.com/in/egilsson/ The Guest Max Grabner — Head of Product at Range, a treasury and risk operating system for digital asset users. Stablecoins have found product-market fit. The question now is: who captures the value, and on whose terms? In this episode of MetaMarkets, Jón and Jan are joined by Max Grabner from Range to explore the infrastructure layer that will determine whether stablecoins become a tool for financial inclusion or a new walled garden controlled by incumbents. The conversation begins with what Range actually does: aggregating fragmented views across chains and custodians, screening counterparties, monitoring multi-sig proposals, and increasingly helping treasuries optimize yield. For stablecoin issuers specifically, Range provides business intelligence on token holder behavior, go-to-market visibility on competitors, and sanctions screening capabilities that enable evidence-based compliance decisions. From there, the discussion turns to where stablecoin demand is actually coming from. Speculative trading remains dominant, but a new wave of inbound is emerging: commodities traders seeking instant settlement, businesses tired of Friday-evening wire transfers that take days to land, and counterparties looking to reduce capital inefficiencies in cross-border payments. The use case is real. The problem is integration: until stablecoins plug into existing workflows, adoption will remain friction-bound. The European picture is more complex. Retail payments within Europe work well. The pain points are cross-border settlement and trade finance, areas where European banking has underperformed and where stablecoins could deliver genuine improvement. Yet MiCA's design tilts the playing field toward banks, requiring issuers to hold reserves within the banking system and creating structural advantages for bank-led consortiums like Kivalis over Web3-native issuers. The episode also tackles Tether's positioning: unregulated but operationally responsive, freezing funds faster than regulated competitors while operating outside any formal supervisory framework. Is this a competitive advantage or a systemic risk? The answer may depend on whether you believe enforcement will ever catch up to borderless digital assets. Stablecoins are no longer competing on technology. They are competing on regulatory positioning, distribution, and trust. Europe's choices in the next two years will determine whether it leads that competition or watches from the sidelines.
• Aave Hack and Economics: Can Aave Compete with Traditional Banks? 22.04.2026 44min

  Aave has long been one of DeFi’s flagship success stories: transparent, permissionless, and highly automated. But after a major exploit involving the KelpDAO bridge created bad debt and triggered emergency interventions, a deeper question has returned to the forefront: Can DeFi lending protocols like Aave truly compete with traditional banks — or do they simply recreate the same risks in new forms? In Episode 10 of MetaMarkets, Jan and Jón are joined by Furkan Danisman, PhD researcher at the University of Toronto and former Bank of Canada researcher, whose recent paper DeFi Lending: Returns, Leverage, and Liquidation Risk offers one of the most data-rich analyses of Aave V3 to date. The conversation begins with the recent exploit that left Aave exposed to bad debt — not because Aave itself was hacked, but because compromised assets were used as collateral to extract real liquidity from the protocol. The incident raises difficult questions about DeFi’s dependence on external infrastructure, cross-chain bridges, and the limits of “trustless” systems when crises require human intervention. From there, the episode explores Aave’s core economics: Why overcollateralization creates both safety and inefficiency How a small group of sophisticated users use recursive leverage (“looping”) to amplify returns Why liquidation waves often look dramatic but may have limited spillovers to broader markets One of the paper’s most striking findings: just 2% of users account for 20% of borrowing volume through leveraged strategies. These users often rely heavily on flash loans and take concentrated risks that can unwind quickly during market stress. The discussion then turns to a larger comparison with banks. Traditional banks create credit more efficiently, but rely on trust, regulation, and maturity transformation. Aave, by contrast, is highly transparent and operationally automated — but capital inefficient by design and vulnerable to collateral shocks. This creates a real trade-off between efficiency, resilience, and openness.The HostsJan Philipp Fritsche — Strategic Director at Oak Security a leading Web3 cybersecurity firm and Co-Founder of Bermuda a privacy protocolJón Egilsson — Former Chair of the Central Bank of Iceland; Co-founder of Monerium, the first company to issue fiat currency on-chain.
• Institutions, Privacy and Quantum Risk are the Driving Forces in 2026 11.02.2026 24min

  The Hosts Jón Egilsson — Former Chair of the Central Bank of Iceland; Co-founder of Monerium, the first company to issue fiat currency on-chain.https://www.linkedin.com/in/egilsson/ Jan Philipp Fritsche — Managing Director at Oak Security, a Web3 cybersecurity firm pioneering research on economic and systemic risks in decentralized systems.https://www.linkedin.com/in/janf/ The next phase of crypto will be defined by execution:privacy that works, compliance that scales, and infrastructure that delivers real economic value.In this episode of MetaMarkets, Jón and Jan unpack what lies beneath the surface of crypto markets as Bitcoin and Ethereum increasingly trade like macro-sensitive risk assets, institutions shift from speculation to infrastructure, and the original crypto ethos collides with privacy, compliance, and control. The discussion begins with the macro backdrop: a weakening U.S. dollar, shifting liquidity conditions, and why non-dollar stablecoins, particularly euro-denominated ones, may quietly gain relevance as diversification assets. What looks like a crypto downturn may instead be a transition phase, driven by large financial institutions absorbing blockchain technology into their own stacks. Rather than pushing token prices higher, banks and institutions are increasingly replicating the best features of crypto programmability, fast settlement, composability, while removing what they see as friction:Public tokens, retail exposure, and governance uncertainty. This helps explain why adoption can grow even as token valuations stagnate. From there, the conversation turns to a core tension shaping the next phase of crypto: permissionless networks vs. institution-controlled infrastructure. Jón and Jan explore how privacy and compliance have become decisive competitive advantages. What once was a cypherpunk ideal is now a mainstream requirement: users and institutions do not want to expose balances and transaction histories by default. The episode examines emerging technical approaches — from zero-knowledge proofs to trusted execution environments and privacy-as-infrastructure models — and why the ability to combine privacy, compliance, and usability may determine the winners of the next cycle. The discussion also tackles quantum risk. It is no longer a purely theoretical concern. While crypto is often framed as uniquely vulnerable, legacy banking systems face even harder upgrade paths. At the same time, Bitcoin’s commitment to immutability creates unique governance and security challenges for older addresses that cannot be made quantum-safe without intervention. The key takeaway is not pessimistic, but evolutionary. Crypto is no longer just competing with itself — it is now competing with banks, capital markets, and institution-grade blockchains that have learned from it. That competition will be uncomfortable, but it will also produce better systems.    
• Bitcoin vs Ethereum 15.12.2025 25min

  HostsJan Philipp Fritsche — Managing Director at Oak Securityhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/janf/Jón Egilsson — Former Chair of the Central Bank of Iceland; Co-founder of Moneriumhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/egilsson Related articleBitcoin Vs. Ethereum And The Flippening Lubin Predictshttps://www.forbes.com/sites/jonegilsson/2025/12/02/bitcoin-vs-ethereum-and-the-flippening-lubin-predicts/ Show summary In this episode of MetaMarkets, Jan Philipp Fritsche and Jón Egilsson explore the idea that money is not a law of nature but a human invention that has been redesigned repeatedly when old systems stopped working. Using monetary history as a guide, they frame the Bitcoin versus Ethereum debate not as an ideological contest but as a question of monetary design. The discussion moves from the gold standard and the Great Depression, through Bretton Woods and the Nixon Shock, to modern fiat systems that prioritize inflation, employment and financial stability over strict control of money supply. These historical shifts illustrate a recurring pattern: when monetary constraints limit growth or stability, systems evolve. Against this backdrop, Bitcoin and Ethereum represent two very different responses to fiat money. Bitcoin is presented as a system built on fixed scarcity, designed as a hedge against discretionary monetary expansion. Ethereum, by contrast, treats its native asset as infrastructure — fuel required for settlement, contracts and coordination — with supply dynamics that adjust based on network usage. Drawing on Jón Egilsson’s recent Forbes interview with Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin, the episode examines the idea of a coming “flippening,” where ETH could surpass BTC in value. The hosts discuss Ethereum’s native monetary loop, its role in tokenization and settlement, and how it increasingly resembles a programmable monetary system rather than a static commodity. The episode concludes by focusing on recent regulatory and infrastructure developments, including a CFTC pilot allowing BTC, ETH and USDC to be used as tokenized collateral. This shift in financial plumbing, the hosts argue, may matter more than price movements, signaling a future where fiat, Bitcoin and Ethereum coexist as complementary forms of money serving different economic roles
• Systemic Stablecoins | Bank of England consultation paper 09.12.2025 16min

  In this MetaMarkets episode, hosts Jan Philipp Fritsche and Jón Egilsson unpack the Bank of England’s consultation on the regulation of sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins.  They focus on the proposed reserve structure: systemic issuers would be fully backed 1:1, with around 40% of backing assets held in unremunerated Bank of England accounts (for instant liquidity/redemptions) and the remaining 60% in short-term UK government debt (gilts)—plus discussion of potential central bank liquidity/repo-style support in stress.    Jón calls the approach progressive (notably, giving non-bank issuers direct central bank access), but flags a key concern: non-interest-bearing reserves may hurt issuer competitiveness and incentives, contrasting the UK approach with the US (more issuer-friendly) and the EU (more bank-exposed credit risk / more complex “fragmented” regulation).  The Hosts Jón Egilsson — Former Chair of the Central Bank of Iceland; Co-founder of Monerium, the first company to issue fiat currency on-chain.  https://www.linkedin.com/in/egilsson Jan Philipp Fritsche — Managing Director at Oak Security, a Web3 cybersecurity firm pioneering research on economic and systemic risks in decentralized systems. https://www.linkedin.com/in/janf/      
• ECB's Central Bank Digital Currency | Ulrich Bindseil 02.12.2025 55min

  Central banks are racing to modernize public money — but can CBDCs compete with stablecoins, and what does monetary sovereignty really mean in a digital, multipolar world?In this episode, Jan and Jón are joined by Prof. Ulrich Bindseil, former Director General for Market Infrastructure & Payments at the European Central Bank and now Professor at TU Berlin, to explore the future of the digital euro, the global stablecoin race, and how monetary power is shifting as payments move on-chain.Ulrich spent more than 30 years at the ECB, overseeing monetary policy operations, market infrastructure (T2/T2S), and later the early design phases of the digital euro. He now researches digital money, monetary architecture, and sovereignty — bringing a uniquely candid view from inside Europe’s most important financial institution.Expect a clear, structured, and open conversation about how CBDCs and stablecoins will coexist, compete, and reshape global finance.What You’ll Learn in This EpisodeOrigins & turning pointsWhy Ulrich chose central banking over academia or the private sector — and what kept him at the ECB for three decades.The moment crypto moved from “curiosity” to a real policy concern inside central banks.The digital euroWhy collapsing cash usage makes digital money inevitable How the ECB’s design philosophy works: a bank-distributed, highly retail focussed CBDC as an alternative to programmable public on-chain money.Why banks continue to resist the digital euro — and how political pressure may shape (or limit) the final form of digital public money. Stablecoins, MiCA, and the GENIUS ActWhy MiCA’s bank-deposit requirement may increase stablecoin fragility — and why Europe risks falling behind the U.S.How the U.S. GENIUS Act could boost USD dominance through on-chain treasury demand.How Euro-stablecoins may struggle under current EU regulation, even if demand exists.Financial stability & the role of banksAre stablecoins that are “narrow banks” structurally safer than banks?Why mandating bank exposure introduces banking-crisis contagion into stablecoins.Do we over-estimate the positive externalities of bank credit creation?Are CBDCs being constrained mainly to protect incumbent banks?Monetary sovereigntyThe three dimensions of sovereignty:Money issuance & functionsMonetary policy & international regimesInfrastructure & cross-border dependenciesHow sanctions, reliance on foreign payment rails, and geopolitical tension shape digital payment architecture.Why infrastructure may matter as much as currency in future monetary power.CBDC & monetary policyWhy central banks reject using CBDC for direct monetary transmission — even though the idea is theoretically powerful.Why zero remuneration for CBDC is an “economic anomaly,” kept only for political reasons.Regulatory designHow stablecoin rules can accidentally undermine financial stability.Why Europe must rethink MiCA if it wants competitive euro-denominated digital money.GuestProf. Ulrich Bindseil – Professor, TU Berlin; former Director General at the European Central BankUlrich researches CBDCs, stablecoin regulation, monetary architecture, and digital-era sovereignty. Previously, he led key areas of the ECB including Market Operations and Market Infrastructure & Payments — where he worked on the digital euro’s early design.https://www.linkedin.com/in/ulrich-bindseil-764b4015The HostsJón Egilsson — Former Chair of the Central Bank of Iceland; Co-founder of Monerium, the first company to issue fiat currency on-chain.https://www.linkedin.com/in/egilssonJan Philipp Fritsche — Managing Director at Oak Security, a Web3 cybersecurity firm pioneering research on economic and systemic risks in decentralized systems.https://www.linkedin.com/in/janf/Key Research by Ulrich BindseilMonetary Sovereignty – Addressing the Challenges of a Digitalized and Multipolar World (Nov 2025)https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5717525Regulatory Responses to
• Stablecoin Emergencies | Rhys Bidder 31.10.2025 1h 13min

  Stablecoins are redefining how money moves across borders — but will regulation keep up?In this episode, Jan and Jón are joined by Rhys Bidder, Senior Lecturer at King’s Business School, King’s College London, and advisor to Chainlink Labs, to discuss how MiCAR, the GENIUS Act, and the UK’s evolving stablecoin framework will shape the future of digital money. Rhys has written widely on stablecoins, CBDCs, and the digital yuan, and offers a deep look at how regulatory design, market structure, and monetary sovereignty intersect in the emerging digital economy. Expect an in-depth exploration of the tension between innovation and financial stability — and how Europe, the U.S., and the U.K. are taking different paths toward the same goal: safe, scalable digital money. What You’ll Learn in This Episode MiCAR vs. GENIUS: Why the EU and U.S. are taking such different approaches to regulating stablecoins. Dollarization and policy response: How the GENIUS Act could accelerate USD dominance — and how Europe is responding  The UK’s next steps: Inside the FCA and Bank of England consultations — from redemption rules to liquidity backstops. Financial stability trade-offs: Why runs on stablecoins may look different from bank runs — and how central banks can design liquidity safety nets. Innovation pressure: How stablecoins are forcing banks and central banks to modernize — and why competition between deposit tokens, CBDCs, and stables could be healthy. Future outlook: What stablecoins will look like in five years — from on-chain HQLA to cross-chain compliance and global standards. Academic insight: Where to study if you want to do a PhD on stablecoins, DeFi, or macro-financial innovation. Guest Rhys Bidder – Senior Lecturer, King’s Business School, King’s College London; Advisor, Chainlink Labs.Rhys researches how digital money is reshaping finance and monetary systems, with a focus on stablecoins, CBDCs, and financial stability.https://www.linkedin.com/in/rhys-bidder-10157826 The Hosts Jón Egilsson is a former Chair of the Central Bank of Iceland and Co-founder of Monerium, the first company to issue fiat currency on-chain. https://www.linkedin.com/in/egilssonJan Philipp Fritsche is Managing Director at Oak Security, a Web3 cybersecurity firm pioneering research on economic and systemic risks in decentralized systems. https://www.linkedin.com/in/janf/
• The Future of Money - Adios a los Bancos with Miguel Fernandez Ordóñez 20.10.2025 48min

  📰 Episode Summary In this episode of MetaMarkets, hosts Jan Fritsche and Jón Egilsson sit down with Miguel Fernández Ordóñez, former Governor of the Bank of Spain and author of Adiós a los Bancos (“Farewell to the Banks”).Ordóñez argues that it’s time to end the banking monopoly on digital money — and to give every citizen direct access to public, risk-free money issued by the central bank. He explains why the current system is fragile, why crises like 2008 keep repeating, and how a Digital Euro could make money safer — if designed as an open public infrastructure, not as a tool to protect incumbents.From the collapse of Iceland’s banks to Europe’s MiCA regulation and the rise of stablecoins, this conversation explores how technology, competition, and monetary reform are reshaping the very foundations of finance. 💡 Key Topics & Ideas Why bank deposits aren’t “real money” — and what that means for financial stability The difference between public digital money and private bank money Lessons from the 2008 crisis: regulation vs. market failure How banking privileges block innovation Why the Digital Euro should be an open platform, not a state-run app Stablecoins and competition: the U.S. vs. European regulatory paths MiCA and the risk of reinforcing incumbent dominance “Banks are in favor of using digital euros — but against the Digital Euro”: unpacking the paradox Liberalization, not protectionism, as the key to progress in payments 🧠 Guest Bio: Miguel Fernández Ordóñez Miguel Fernández Ordóñez served as Governor of the Bank of Spain (2006–2012) and previously held senior roles in Spain’s Ministry of Economy and the European Central Bank.He is the author of Adiós a los Bancos, a groundbreaking book that challenges the foundations of modern banking and advocates for full monetary liberalization — enabling citizens to hold digital central bank money directly.His recent work focuses on the intersection of monetary reform, competition, and digital innovation.
• Fixing Crypto in Europe – with Marina Markezic (EUCI) 24.08.2025 1h 5min

  Traditional finance is moving on-chain. Can Europe keep pace? We sit down with Marina Markezic, co-founder and Executive Director of the European Crypto Initiative (EUCI), to unpack how regulation is shaping the future of blockchain and finance in Europe. We cover breaking news from Stripe and Circle launching their own layer-ones, ESMA’s push to expand the DLT Pilot Regime, and even the European Central Bank’s exploration of issuing a digital euro on Ethereum or Solana. Marina brings her unique perspective from years of advising projects on governance, DeFi, NFTs, and regulation, as well as lobbying for innovation-friendly frameworks in Brussels. Expect a deep dive into how European crypto regulation compares to the U.S., the unintended consequences of MiCA, and why tokenization could reshape Europe’s financial infrastructure. What You’ll Learn in This Episode How ESMA wants to expand the DLT Pilot Regime to encourage broader tokenization. Why have only three firms joined the DLT sandbox so far. The hidden risks in Europe’s Data Act and its surprising requirement for smart contracts to be alterable and require backdoors. How lobbying battles in Brussels pit traditional financial institutions against crypto-native builders. The contrasting visions of Europe and the U.S. on stablecoins, CBDCs, and financial market modernization. Why regulatory vision matters more than technical details when shaping the future of finance. Guest: Marina Markezic Marina Markezic – Co-founder & Executive Director, of the European Crypto Initiative https://eu.ci Marina has advised blockchain projects since 2017 on governance and regulation, and is a leading voice on European crypto policy. Follow EUCI on https://www.linkedin.com/company/european-crypto-initiative and https://x.com/EuCInitiative  The Hosts Jón Egilsson is an Executive Member at King’s College London and an Executive Director at Monerium, the first company to issue fiat currency on-chain. https://uk.linkedin.com/in/egilsson  Jan Philipp Fritsche Managing Director of Oak Security, a Web3 cybersecurity firm that pioneered research on economic attack vectors in decentralized systems.https://www.linkedin.com/in/janf/   Links & Resources European Crypto Initiative (EUCI) https://eu.ci  ECB exploring Ethereum, Solana for digital euro launch according to FT https://cointelegraph.com/news/europe-mulls-ethereum-solana-digital-euro-launch Stripe and Circle are announcing their own Layer 1s https://www.coindesk.com/news-analysis/2025/08/17/why-circle-and-stripe-and-many-others-are-launching-their-own-blockchains ESMA Report on the DLT Pilot Regime (2025) https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2025-06/ESMA75-117376770-460_Report_on_the_functioning_and_review_of_the_DLTR_-_Art.14.pdf  Data Act https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/data-act   
• Will MICAR break the Euro? 15.06.2025 27min

  Europe wants to lead in digital money—but is its own regulation setting it up to fail? In this episode of MetaMarkets, Jan Fritsche and Jón Egilsson are joined by Hana to unpack why Europe’s stablecoin rules could backfire. We discuss how MiCAR—the EU’s flagship crypto law—might actually increase risk, tilt the playing field in favor of big banks, and unintentionally help the U.S. dollar win the digital currency race. You’ll hear: Why the euro isn’t as “singular” or safe as it should be under current rules How a stablecoin tied to a bank could be under distress, as USDC once was Why Europe is forcing stablecoins to rely on banks they’re supposed to compete with What could happen if the next financial shock hits  What needs to change if the euro wants to stay relevant in a digitized world
• Trump's Stablecoin Plan—Is Europe Ready? 05.05.2025 48min

  This is the first episode of MetaMarkets, in which we dive deep into the economic, regulatory, and technological shifts shaping the future of money. Hosts Jón Helgi Egilsson (Executive Director, Monerium) and Jan Philipp Fritsche (Managing Director, Oak Security) explore the intersection of monetary policy, stablecoins, and the emerging geopolitical battle for currency influence. 📌 Chapters & Links Why This Podcast?Jón shares why financial transformation needs public dialogue, and Jan highlights the need to connect end-users, builders, and regulators. The U.S. Economic DilemmaWhy the dollar’s strength is both an asset and a trap. Discussion on tariffs, deficits, and debt.🔗 A User’s Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System Trump's Strategic PlaybookHow Stephen Miran’s thinking may underpin Trump’s economic approach.🔗 Trump’s Stablecoin Strategy To Reinforce U.S. Dollar Dominance (Forbes) What Dollar Dominance Really MeansStablecoins, global demand, and U.S. strategy to “weaponize” crypto rails.🔗 Standard Chartered: Stablecoin Sector May Reach $2 Trillion Europe’s Missed Opportunity?Jón argues the ECB is overprotecting incumbents instead of competing globally. Policy TakeawaysTreat non-bank stablecoin issuers equally. Let innovation thrive. Avoid regulatory gatekeeping. Uncertainty, Volatility & Fiscal PolicyJan explains how uncertainty is bad for fiscal policy.🔗 Government spending multipliers in (un)certain times (Journal of Public Economics) Military Spending & GrowthWhy the U.S. may benefit more than Europe from diverging fiscal strategies. On-chain Chaos & Risk MispricingHow recent volatility triggered economic crypto exploits.🔗 How the Hype for HyperLiquid's Vault Evaporated on Concerns Over Centralization🔗 A Vanishing $212M Bitcoin Order Caused Chaos for Traders. Is Spoofing Back in Crypto? Spoofing, Scams & Smart RegulationWhy spoofing is a crime in traditional markets — and how crypto could build in better defenses, on-chain. The Need for Smart RegulationWe need smart regulation, iterative improvement, and transparent competition. 🎧 Subscribe & Follow Jan Fritsche – Managing Director – Oak Security Jón Helgi Egilsson – Executive Director – Monerium