The Jeremy Boreing Show

Epizode

• 
  The $20 Burrito That Blew Up The Right | Weds LIVE Ep. 50 13.08.2026 2h 16min

  A college student complained he couldn't afford a $20 burrito. A senior producer replied that his wife feeds a family of eight homemade burritos for less than that. Twelve million views later, the American right was at war with itself over whether the affordability crisis is real — and whether anyone on the right is allowed to say so out loud. On this Wednesday Live panel, Jeremy Boreing sits down with the three men who got the facts right and still watched the room turn on them. Joel Berry — Marine Corps veteran, former managing editor of The Babylon Bee, author of the bestselling The Postmodern Pilgrim's Progress, and senior producer of this show — wrote the post that started it. David Harsanyi, founding editor of The Federalist and senior writer at the Washington Examiner, has spent the week making the data case that food inflation has returned to something close to its historical norm. Daniel Di Martino, Venezuelan-born economist, Manhattan Institute fellow, and founder of the Dissident Project, watched socialism destroy what was once the fourth-richest country in the world — and argues the American shortage was built by government and can be unbuilt by it. The numbers set up the problem. The July inflation report released this morning put headline CPI at 3.4 percent annually and core at 2.5 percent, both down slightly from June. Food inflation over the last two years has run near 3 percent a year. The acute spike that began in 2021 and crested in 2022 is over. And yet a July Washington Post poll of nearly 2,700 adults found 65 percent of Americans calling grocery prices unaffordable — including 56 percent of households earning more than $100,000 a year. Why the gap? Because the rate of increase came back down and the prices never did. Grocery prices are up roughly 30 percent since the pandemic. A twenty-two-year-old who paid seven-fifty for a Chipotle burrito in high school now pays eleven-sixty. That is a complaint about the price level, not the rate of change — and as Cato's Ryan Bourne argues, telling people to cook cheaper substitutes may be the political equivalent of Jimmy Carter telling Americans to put on a sweater. This hour is the argument the right has been avoiding: how to say a true thing without insulting the person who needs to hear it. The panel works through the dispersion hiding under the headline numbers, the four categories where the real pain lives — housing, healthcare, tuition, childcare — and the policy levers that actually move prices. Di Martino makes the housing supply case in plain English: zoning, parking mandates, permitting. He also says on the record that lifting tariffs is the fastest available lever on goods prices, which puts him crosswise with the current administration. Harsanyi defends the historical context: food's share of the family budget has fallen from roughly 42 percent in 1901 to under 10 percent today. Berry connects affordability to family formation, marriage, and birth rates — and to why economic populism captured a large share of the party instead of the case for cutting spending, taxes, regulation, and entitlements. Then there are the stakes. Zohran Mamdani won New York City on a cost-of-living platform, and DSA candidates are gaining ground elsewhere on the same pitch. His argument was never that the right is cruel. It was that nothing has been tried. Did the right hand him that? And is it about to hand somebody else the midterms? The hour closes on the hardest version of the question. A family of eight can eat well on twenty dollars if somebody is home to cook. What is the answer in a household where nobody is — two working parents, no time, no margin? Each guest names the one thing he would remove rather than add to make American life cheaper. Subscribe for full episodes, monologues, and panels from The Jeremy Boreing Show. 00:00:00 – Inflation Report & the Great Burrito Battle 00:05:13 – The Burrito Tweet, Backlash & COVID's Lasting Damage 00:14:32 – Is the Right Embracing Left-Wing Economics? 00:21:14 – Entitlements, Freedom & the Value of Struggle 00:38:20 – Marriage, Divorce & the Real Affordability Crisis 00:42:27 – College Debt & the Broken University System 01:05:14 – Congress, the Administrative State & Trump's Record 01:20:47 – Obama's Legacy, Socialism & American Exceptionalism 01:41:36 – Raising Conservative Kids & the Conservative Message Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Hasan Piker and Candace Owens Are Selling You Third-World Thinking | Ep. 49 11.08.2026 41min

  Two trials are running in America right now. One is in a Fourth District courtroom in Provo, Utah, where prosecutors have spent months building the case against Tyler Robinson the hard way — eyewitness testimony, hours of security footage, forensic reports, DNA, handwriting on a shell casing, a .30-06 rifle. Slow, methodical, adversarial, and bound by rules. The accused is presumed innocent. The evidence has to survive cross-examination. The other trial is happening behind a podcast microphone. It has no judge, no jury, no burden of proof, and no standard for what counts as evidence. In that trial, the verdict is set by likes and shares, insight arrives as gossip and hearsay, and the culprit changes week to week. Millions of people are watching it and believing it. In this monologue, Jeremy Boreing argues that the distance between those two rooms is the distance between Western civilization and everything that came before it — and that we are walking backwards across it faster than most people realize. Jeremy starts with a viral video out of Dearborn, Michigan, and Allie Beth Stuckey's response to it, then widens the lens: the physical walls at the border are not the only ones crumbling. The walls in our minds are cracking too. Cross-cultural researchers describe the West as a guilt/innocence culture — an objective moral code, applied to everyone, where justice is blind and the claim outranks the man. Most of the world runs on honor and shame instead, where your worth is issued by the people watching and can be revoked by them, where an unanswered insult is a kind of social death, and where the sneer isn't a failure to make an argument — the sneer is the argument. That framework, drawn from the work of psychologists Angela K.-Y. Leung and Dov Cohen, explains an enormous amount about the American public square in 2026: why ad hominem now reads as authority, why the Republican primary debates of 2016 went the way they did, why Candace Owens told Andrew Wilson that objective debate standards are for the soft, and why the mob's verdict has quietly replaced the evidence. From there, Jeremy makes the case for how strange the West actually is — starting with the price tag. A fixed price is not natural. Corruption is natural. The haggle is natural. What the West built instead was impersonal exchange: contracts a court would enforce, property a king couldn't seize, honest weights and measures commanded by the God of Israel and enforced for centuries by a Church that treated cheating a stranger as a matter for your soul. Nobel-winning economist Douglass North traced the explosion of Western prosperity to that structure. Harvard anthropologist Joseph Henrich traced it back further — to the medieval Church banning cousin marriage, dissolving the clan, and creating something genuinely new in human history: the individual. And it explains John Adams, who defended the British soldiers after the Boston Massacre because he believed the truth was owed even to the enemy of his own people — and lost half his law practice for it. It explains a mother and father in southern Utah who looked at a surveillance image, recognized their own son, and drove him to the sheriff's office themselves. Set that against Tucker Carlson's 2015 rule that he would never criticize his brother in public, under any circumstances, even for mass murder. That's the tribe placed above the truth. Blood over justice. Half the world would hear it and nod. Jeremy's argument: the Left says the transaction was always theft, so take yours back. The post-liberal Right, borrowing from Carl Schmitt, says the tribe was always the point, so reward friends and punish enemies. Different roads, same destination — and neither is offering anything new. They are offering what everybody had before Christianity showed up. None of it was inevitable, and none of it is irreversible. We built the fixed price. We built the jury. We built the father who turns in his own son. Those were choices, and choices can be made differently tomorrow. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Tucker's Subversive Plan, Aleksandr Dugin, and the Foreign Op Behind It All | Weds LIVE Ep. 48 06.08.2026 2h 30min

  Weds LIVE guests: James Lindsay, Ryan Mauro, J Michael Waller Tucker Carlson has told the Columbia Journalism Review he intends to help build a third party, calling the American government "a one-party state posing as a democracy" that "needs to be broken." Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie, Joe Kent, and Brian Glenn have now been photographed around Carlson's table, with Greene declaring that "the movement has begun." Jeremy has been making one argument about Tucker Carlson for a long time, and it wasn't the popular one. The popular argument on the right is that Tucker is a grifter — that he says whatever the audience wants to hear because the audience pays for it. Jeremy's argument has been the opposite, and it is more troubling: Tucker isn't chasing a check. He's building something. A political project with a coherent shape — socially conservative, economically left of the Republican Party, and organized around opposition to Israel and to American power abroad. That political project isn't merely an organic movement. It's the result of hostile foreign actors who have been working, through division and chaos, to take down the West for decades. James Lindsay — mathematician, co-author of Cynical Theories, founder of New Discourses, and the man who popularized the term "woke right" — returns to the show to trace the philosophical chain. In April 2024, Carlson sat in Moscow with Aleksandr Dugin, who has been under American sanctions since 2015, and let Dugin tell a Christian audience that transgenderism, the assault on the family, and the transhumanist project all descend from the Protestant Reformation. Carlson's response: "What you're describing is clearly happening, and it's horrifying." Lindsay explains why you cannot accept that diagnosis without swallowing the prescription — and why, if the Reformation was the original error, the American founding becomes the disease rather than the cure. J. Michael Waller — author of 'Big Intel' and 'Secret Empire: The KGB in Russia Today,' president of Georgetown Research, who learned Soviet disinformation tradecraft from defector Ladislav Bittman — supplies the operational history. Soviet theorists called the move reflexive control: you don't tell your adversary what to do, you shape what he believes about himself until he chooses your objective and calls it his own idea. Waller walks through his "Ten Points to Understand Alexandr Dugin," including Dugin's own stated goal of "the destruction of the American empire," and why multipolarity has always been a scam. Power isn't shared between superpowers. Somebody is always in charge. Ryan Mauro — senior fellow for counter-extremism at the Capital Research Center, president of the Mauro Institute — brings the current reporting. Mauro broke the story placing Candace Owens on the SPIEF program in Russia. He also investigated the woman Carlson introduced to his audience as Elizabeth Lane; according to a report from The Insider, her name is Iza Bendianishvili and her romantic partner is an FSB officer. When Carlson raised the intelligence allegations on air, he said: "I just wanna say out loud, I don't care." Mauro will explain what he found, and what happened when Lane learned he was looking. The right spent fifteen years learning to recognize ideological capture arriving from the left. The question this hour asks is whether it missed the same thing arriving from the east — and whether a third party organized around contempt for the American inheritance is a conservative project at all, or a very old one wearing conservative clothes. Also discussed: the collapse of journalistic guardrails and who is left to monitor any of this; whether institutional distrust on the right now runs on the same mechanism as critical theory; and concrete habits for the viewer who no longer trusts a single institutional source. Subscribe for new episodes of The Jeremy Boreing Show. New Wednesday Live panels weekly. 00:00:00 – Tucker's Speech: First Reactions 00:09:10 – Platforming Elizabeth Lane & Alexander Dugin 00:19:10 – Mondialism and the Fourth Political Theory 00:33:07 – Putin, Tsarist Christianity & the Katechon Prophecy 00:52:14 – Honor Culture and the Nazi Ideology Parallel 01:19:10 – Why Young Men Are Drawn to Strongman Politics 01:24:28 – The Real Failure: Mondialism, Not the West 01:36:13 – Tucker vs. Trump & the JD Vance Question 01:48:02 – Grading Tucker's 10-Point Vision Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Fauci’s Reckoning — Will There Be *Any* Accountability? | Fri LIVE Ep. 47 01.08.2026 2h 17min

  Friday LIVE guests: Michael Knowles, Josh Herr, Dr. Simone Gold For five years, the conservative movement has been right about COVID — about the schools, the mandates, the lab-leak question, the censorship. But being right was never enough. This week, the receipts finally arrived. Anthony Fauci sat before the Senate Homeland Security Committee and invoked his Fifth Amendment right 111 times, declining to answer a single question about the origins of the pandemic. Days earlier, Senator Rand Paul released more than 1,100 pages of Fauci's private diary. In it, Fauci took personal credit for persuading New York and California to close their schools — the same closures he spent years publicly insisting he had "nothing to do with." The private record and the public statements do not match. And under oath, with the chance to explain, he said nothing. This panel goes through what actually dropped: the Proximal Origin Slack messages, in which the scientists who publicly declared a lab origin implausible privately put the odds far higher; the NIH keyword filters used to erase public comments about the Wuhan Institute of Virology, ivermectin, and the vaccines; the record-destruction requests; the celebrity diary entries; and the taxpayer-funded campaign to win Fauci a million dollars in cash prizes. There is a growing faction that believes its only job is to tell you how bad things are — to confirm, week after week, that the people running your institutions lied to you. They're often right. And they make a fortune being right while changing nothing. You only win by winning. The vaccine mandate didn't die because people were angry about it. It died because a handful of organizations stopped complaining and fought back — in court, through the institutions we already have. When the Biden administration ordered every employer with 100+ employees to enforce the mandate, The Daily Wire sued, and the challenge reached the Supreme Court as NFIB v. OSHA. In January 2022, the Court struck the mandate down 6-3, and it died. The mandate rested on the claim that vaccination stopped transmission — now universally conceded to have been wrong — and the legal case was won before that concession existed. Michael Knowles (host of The Michael Knowles Show, author of Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds) was one of the earliest and most consistent voices on COVID censorship; the NIH filter documents are the institutional confirmation of the argument he was making in 2020. Josh Herr, former General Counsel of The Daily Wire, ran the legal strategy that beat the mandate at the Supreme Court and breaks down what a presidential pardon does and doesn't cover. Dr. Simone Gold — physician, attorney, founder of America's Frontline Doctors, and author of I Do Not Consent — organized the 2020 White Coat Summit and was deplatformed within a day. We cover the Fifth Amendment and the pardon, the coming contempt vote, and whether real accountability is still possible. 00:00:00 – Fauci Pleads the Fifth 111 Times 00:02:59 – Meet the Panel & the Mandate Lawsuit 00:06:14 – Fauci's Diary and Alleged Perjury 00:13:54 – How the Diary Surfaced & Fauci's Real Motives 00:19:46 – Fauci's AIDS-Era Playbook & Loving Humanity in the Abstract 00:24:38 – Presidential Pardons: A History of Abuse 00:32:31 – When Fauci Became a God & Science Without Philosophy 00:38:13 – Doctors, Transgender Medicine, and Lost Moral Foundations 00:58:13 – Science Is a Tool, Not the Truth 01:06:11 – Universities, Institutions, and Why We Need Them 01:19:50 – Rebuilding Trust: Family, Flags, and Agency 01:24:59 – Will Fauci Face Justice? COVID's Toll on Gen Z 01:44:24 – Suing Over the Vaccine Mandate & Vaccine Safety Debate 02:00:05 – Duty vs. Collectivism & Dr. Gold's New Book Subscribe to The Jeremy Boreing Show for new episodes every week. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Tucker's Demons, Vance's Failure, and America's Spiritual War | Ep. 46 w/ Rod Dreher 27.07.2026 2h 11min

  Jeremy Boreing sits down with author and cultural critic Rod Dreher for a nearly two-hour conversation about his forthcoming book, Weimar America — and the argument that the same illiberal spirit Dreher once diagnosed on the left is now rising on the right. Dreher’s 2020 bestseller Live Not by Lies described wokeness as a form of soft totalitarianism, drawing on the testimony of Christians who had survived Soviet communism. Five years later, after a long stint living in Viktor Orban’s Hungary, he returned to America convinced that the warning signs of a pre-totalitarian society — what Hannah Arendt called social atomization, a collapse of faith in institutions, the embrace of transgression, and a growing indifference to truth — are now flashing across the American right as much as the left. At the center of the discussion is a generation: the Zoomers. Jeremy and Rod dig into the rise of white identity politics and Christian nationalism among young men, the pull of Nick Fuentes and the Groypers, and Dreher’s unsettling report from Washington that a large share of the young men now working on the right have drifted toward radical, “tear it all down” politics. His core claim is provocative — that the dissident right hasn’t rediscovered conservatism at all, but has imported Marxism’s founding impulse, that the inheritance itself is the enemy, and rebranded it for a right-wing audience. The conversation doesn’t flinch from the fracture inside the conservative coalition. Jeremy and Rod discuss Tucker Carlson’s turn, his platforming of Fuentes, and the end of Dreher’s friendship with him; Boreing’s blistering assessment of Candace Owens and her treatment of Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk; and their shared concern about JD Vance — a man Dreher says he still hopes will one day be president, but who he fears may be making what he calls the “von Papen mistake,” the fatal 1930s miscalculation that a radical movement’s energy can be harnessed and controlled. From there the two turn to faith and culture: the search for God among young men drawn to older, more liturgical Christianity; the pilgrimage to Chartres; the “vitalism” now competing with the gospel; and why Dreher believes a moralistic, therapeutic, feel-good evangelicalism is no match for the moment. They wrestle with classical liberalism as a “secular manifestation of Christianity,” whether the West can hold together without a living faith, and the lessons — and limits — of Orban’s project in Hungary. The back half moves to technology and the soul. Jeremy and Rod debate artificial intelligence as a kind of “dark re-enchantment,” the fear that digital culture is neurologically reshaping a generation’s ability to perceive God, and Boreing’s counter that AI’s harms may simply be the front-loaded costs of every great technology. They make the case that freedom is only possible when it’s bounded by virtue, and consider where policy — on pornography, social media, and the protection of minors — is the right tool for the job. It closes somewhere more personal: Dreher’s nostos, his journey home to Louisiana, the loss of his sister and father, the end of his marriage, Dante, and how he came to believe that the only real Ithaca is heaven. His advice to the young men who feel abandoned by their culture is direct — get offline, search for God, learn to suffer well, and refuse to give in, because “never again is now.” Chapters: 0:00 Rod Dreher and the warning of “Weimar America” 1:18 Wokeness, soft totalitarianism, and the arrival of the “woke right” 6:00 Liberalism as secular Christianity — and the danger of its collapse 12:22 Chartres, young men returning to tradition, and “vitalism” vs. the gospel 16:51 The feckless church: evangelicalism, COVID, and the beauty deficit 36:01 The death of print, AI pastors, and the seduction of the fake 42:06 Hannah Arendt, atomization, and losing a shared reality 43:44 The DC trip, the Groypers, and the Weimar timeline 1:02:29 The right’s civil war: Tucker Carlson and the 2028 stakes 1:09:17 JD Vance, Candace Owens, and the silence over Erika Kirk 1:15:34 Tucker’s demons, spiritual warfare, and “deep, deep danger” 1:23:09 Antisemitism, Israel, and the markers of a Weimar society 1:28:26 AI as dark re-enchantment and a generation that can’t perceive God 1:44:10 Freedom, virtue, and the case for policy on porn and social media 1:52:52 Dreher’s nostos: divorce, Dante, and “never again is now” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  The Navy Pilot Who Dodged Missiles — Then Got Stuck in Orbit | Ep 45 w/ Captain Butch Wilmore 23.07.2026 1h 51min

  Captain Barry "Butch" Wilmore has spent 464 days in space — 278 of them unexpected. When the Boeing Starliner he was flight-testing began losing thrusters on its approach to the International Space Station, a mission planned for roughly a week turned into a nine-and-a-half-month stay in orbit and a return to Earth aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule. In this feature-length conversation, Jeremy Boreing sits down with the retired NASA astronaut and U.S. Navy test pilot to talk about fear, faith, family, and what it actually takes to keep your head when the machine you're strapped into starts to fail. Wilmore's story runs from the hollers of Mount Juliet, Tennessee — where a mischievous Baptist kid was shaped by his parents, his coaches, and a biblical foundation — to the deck of an aircraft carrier, where he logged 663 landings (226 of them at night) and flew the A-7 and the F/A-18 Hornet in combat during the first Gulf War. He walks Jeremy through what it's like to dodge a missile at night with almost no depth perception, how a naval aviator learns to master terror, and why he insists that fear is an opponent, never an ally. He is one of only two people in history to fly five different spacecraft — the Space Shuttle, Soyuz, the ISS, Starliner, and Dragon — and the road there included a nine-and-a-half-year wait after the Columbia tragedy set his astronaut class back years. The heart of the episode is the Starliner mission. As commander on the spacecraft's first crewed flight, Wilmore watched four of his eight aft-firing thrusters drop offline — then a fifth — losing a full degree of control for the first time in the history of human spaceflight. He describes canceling the software that would have shut the failing thrusters down, flying manually toward the station, and knowing before he ever docked that he and fellow astronaut Sunny Williams would not be coming home on that ship. What makes this more than a space story is Wilmore's refusal to call himself "stranded." Drawing on the Apostle Paul's contentment in shipwreck and prison, he explains how he stayed at peace living out of a sleeping bag in a Japanese laboratory module, eating food other astronauts had set aside as trash, with no fixed date to come home. Jeremy and Butch go deep on the sovereignty of God, the difference between freedom and law, John Adams' warning that the Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people, and why the gospel — not raw human agency — sits at the center of it all. They also take on the American space program itself: why politics now sits upstream of engineering, how bringing Russia into the International Space Station shaped its 51.6-degree orbit and limited its usefulness for reaching deeper into the solar system, and why Wilmore has become a fierce advocate for keeping manual control in every crewed spacecraft. Finally, the conversation turns to a generation. Jeremy and Butch talk about Gen Z, the formative years COVID took from young people, and the case for hope over despair — the conviction, as Jeremy puts it, that you can step forward in faith and watch the ground appear beneath your feet. Wilmore closes on his Tennessee roots, the governor's race a residency statute took off the table, and where he believes the Lord may lead him next. This is a conversation about courage and precision, marriage and fidelity, patriotism and providence — and about a country Wilmore still calls the land of opportunity. Captain Butch Wilmore's new memoir, Stuck in Space: An Astronaut's Hope Through the Unexpected, is available now. Subscribe for full episodes of The Jeremy Boreing Show. 00:00 464 Days in Space, 278 Unexpected 03:03 From Backwoods Tennessee to Orbit 04:09 The Mischievous Kid Who Needed God 07:30 The Coaches Who Molded a Man 09:48 The Patriotic Pull That Changed Everything 12:47 663 Carrier Landings, 226 at Night 18:22 Mastering Fear When Missiles Lock On 25:25 Dodging Missiles Over Iraq at Night 34:06 Fidelity, Marriage, and 280 Days Away 46:00 9,000 Applications, Columbia, and NASA Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  The Right Is at War With Itself | Weds LIVE Ep. 44 23.07.2026 1h 53min

  Wednesday LIVE with Nick Freitas, Jared Monroe, and John Strand. What is a conservative? What defines the American right? In 2026 those questions no longer have an obvious answer — and the fight over it is tearing the Conservative Movement apart in real time. In this live panel, Jeremy Boreing sits down with three men who have each answered that question with their lives, to ask what conservatism is actually supposed to be — not what it's against, but what it's for. Because right now the movement is at war with itself over almost everything. The Tate brothers were arrested, and while most of the right saw justice being done, a loud corridor of the movement rushed to their defense. There's the JD Vance–Marco Rubio split, the fight over Iran, and — of all things — Christopher Nolan's new adaptation of The Odyssey, which the right fighting about savagely. Underneath every one of those fights is the same question: who gets to define this movement, and the country the movement claims it wants to conserve? In this episode: – What is a conservative? Propositional Americanism vs. the purity death spiral — and the real fight underneath the JD Vance / Marco Rubio foreign-policy noise. – "What is a man for?" The Tate arrest, the young men sold strength at no cost, and what the outrage machine and the Tate brand have in common. The Odyssey. How the oldest story in Western civilization became a casting-war loyalty test — and what that costs the movement that claims to defend it. GUESTS: Nick Freitas — former U.S. Army Special Forces weapons sergeant with two combat tours in Iraq, and a ten-year veteran of the Virginia House of Delegates who chose not to seek re-election. Jared Monroe — known for years as "Not Gay Jared" alongside Steven Crowder, now running his own independent media operation. John Strand — a former America's Frontline Doctors figure from Simone Gold's COVID-skeptic operation, author of Patriot Plea, and a Congressional candidate in Florida’s 19th district. This is a conversation about American conservatism, the MAGA coalition, Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, and what American conservatism becomes if it forgets what it was ever trying to conserve. Three men, three very different roads, one question. 0:00 – Cold Open: Tate Brothers' Arrest, The Odyssey's Record Debut & Crisis on the Right 5:49 – Reacting to Nolan's The Odyssey: Conservative Story, "Woke" Casting? 11:22 – Ceding Cultural Ground: Why Conservatives Stopped Making Art 19:28 – Parenting Through Pop Culture: Turning Media Into Teaching Moments 26:48 – Nolan's Bold Choices & the "Want-to-Want-Tos" of Conservative Film 30:36 – Candace Owens, the Kirk Assassination Conspiracies & the Cult of "Receipts" 41:47 – COVID, the Groyper War & the Rise of Andrew Tate and Nick Fuentes 53:42 – The Founders, Human Nature & the Constitutional Order 59:24 – Escaping the Internet: Real Community & the "Severance" Effect 1:05:24 – Mass Immigration, Assimilation & the Great Replacement Debate 1:11:05 – Nice Jesus vs. Angry Jesus: Christian Tribalism Online 1:18:19 – Community, Comedy & Why Gen Z Is Returning to Movie Theaters 1:23:23 – Faith, Family & the Jewish Model of Legacy 1:28:32 – Great Man vs. Good Man: Redefining Masculine Legacy 1:37:49 – Jeremy's Razors, Voting & Defining Conservatism in 2026 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  The Country That Jails You for a Facebook Post | Ep 43 w/ Andrew Gold 21.07.2026 1h 41min

  Is Britain still a free country? Jeremy Boreing sits down with Andrew Gold — journalist, former BBC documentary maker, and host of the Heretics podcast — for a wide-ranging conversation about what Gold sees as the unraveling of Britain, and why he believes Americans are watching a preview of their own future. Gold argues the UK is facing a "multi-pronged attack on liberalism": a government growing more draconian, the rapid Islamification of major cities like Birmingham, and the collapse of the free-speech culture Britain once shared with the United States. Jeremy and Andrew open with proposed legislation that would force YouTube and other platforms to prioritize state-adjacent outlets like the BBC and Channel 4 over independent media — a move Gold calls "anti-social media" and warns could push Britain closer to North Korea and Russia than to America. From there the two trace nearly every fault line in modern British life. Gold tells the story of being pushed off camera at the BBC — informed, he says, that a white man could no longer host the documentaries he'd spent years researching. They examine why so many in the West embrace what some call "suicidal empathy," and Gold makes the case that it isn't empathy at all but narcissism and status-seeking, drawing on Will Storr's "The Status Game." The conversation turns to the grooming gang scandal and the scale of abuse alleged in Rupert Lowe's report, the decades-long institutional cover-up, whistleblower Maggie Oliver, and how Tommy Robinson became, in Gold's telling, a national villain treated as "worse than Hitler" for raising the alarm. They contrast the 31-month sentence handed to Lucy Connolly over a since-deleted Facebook post with far lighter treatment of other offenders — the "two-tier justice" many Britons now believe defines the country — against the backdrop of the Southport attack and the killer Axel Rudakubana. Jeremy and Andrew then take on democracy itself: whether voters can actually stop mass immigration when the outcomes they vote for keep getting overridden, from Brexit to California's Proposition 8. Gold explains David Goodhart's "anywhere versus somewhere" framework — the rootless elite who can live anywhere versus the rooted citizens who bear the cost of rapid change — and why cousin marriage, tribal voting blocs, and the welfare state make assimilation so difficult. Jeremy makes a provocative argument of his own: that mass migration is, in a sense, worse than colonialism — importing the least successful systems in the world into the most successful, rather than the reverse. The two debate the "creedal nation," whether America's founding proposition still binds newcomers, and what it means that so many arrivals are never actually asked to embrace the culture, the creed, or the country. Finally, they turn to faith and the monarchy: King Charles recasting himself as a defender of many faiths rather than the Christian faith, the singular dignity of Queen Elizabeth II, and whether Britain has forgotten that it is a Christian country. Gold ends on a fragile note of hope — Reform UK, Nigel Farage, Rupert Lowe, and Kemi Badenoch — and whether a fractured right can unite before 2029. An unflinching conversation about immigration, Islam, free speech, nationalism, and the survival of Western civilization — and a warning, from someone living inside it, about where America may be headed. Andrew Gold hosts the Heretics podcast. Subscribe for more long-form conversations from The Jeremy Boreing Show, and tell us in the comments: is Britain a warning America will heed, or ignore? 0:00 Cold Open 0:52 What's Happening in Britain? 3:59 Free Speech: America vs Britain 5:46 A Nation of Strangers 8:28 The BBC Told Me a White Man Can't Host 11:51 It's Not Empathy — It's Narcissism 17:09 The Grooming Gang Scandal 22:12 Tommy Robinson: "Worse Than Hitler" 24:25 Lucy Connolly and Two-Tier Justice 27:10 When Democracy Stops Working 33:52 Anywhere People vs Somewhere People 45:24 Is There a Way Out? 52:45 Mass Migration vs Colonialism 1:07:00 Why Islam Is Different 1:23:24 The Monarchy, King Charles, and Hope for Britain Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Candace Owens’ Empire of Lies Is Collapsing in Real Time | Weds LIVE Ep. 42 08.07.2026 2h 11min

  This week, prosecutors in Provo, Utah began laying out the case against Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk — forensic evidence, surveillance footage, a confession note, and sworn testimony from the lead investigator. As the preliminary hearing opened, Candace Owens dismissed the proceeding as a "show trial," telling her audience the "real trial" would come later and casting herself as a lone truth-teller fighting demons on Charlie's behalf. Jeremy Boreing breaks down why what Candace is doing is not just wrong but deliberately misleading–and evil. A preliminary hearing isn't a trial — it's a narrow legal procedure to determine whether a case is strong enough to proceed. Candace knows the difference. The question is why she's betting her audience doesn't. The show walks through months of specific claims Candace has made — that Tyler Robinson was never on campus, that Charlie's microphone exploded rather than a shot being fired, that Erika Kirk, Charlie's own security team, Israel, or the federal government were somehow complicit — and measures each one against what has actually been entered into evidence: surveillance footage placing Robinson on campus four times the day of the shooting, a medical examiner's report confirming a single gunshot wound from a bolt-action rifle, DNA evidence on the recovered weapon, and a confession note and text messages already part of the court record. Joining Jeremy for this conversation: Mark Meckler — co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, President of Convention of States Action, and CEO of JTN Networks (parent company of Just the News, Human Events, and The Post Millennial). Meckler brings two decades of experience watching grassroots conservative movements built, captured, and weaponized. Gary Melton (Paramount Tactical) — a former U.S. Army Special Forces Weapons Sergeant and Sniper Team Leader with four combat deployments, who has spent nine months systematically fact-checking Candace Owens' specific claims against the assassination evidence, one by one. Will Chamberlain — a Georgetown Law-trained attorney, former publisher of Human Events, Senior Counsel at the Article III Project, and VP for External Affairs at the Edmund Burke Foundation, who explains the legal distinction between a preliminary hearing and a trial — and the real defamation exposure Candace now faces. The panel also addresses new research from the Network Contagion Research Institute suggesting a measurable link between Candace's public claims naming Erika Kirk as a suspect and subsequent spikes in death threats against her — and what it means when a media figure builds what researchers describe as a "permission structure" for targeted harassment. This is a conversation about what happens when institutional truth-finding — slow, procedural, occasionally unglamorous — collides with an information ecosystem that rewards speed, certainty, and grievance over verification. It's about the difference between naming demons and becoming one. And it's about what accountability, both legal and moral, actually looks like for the people left in the wake of a tragedy that some have chosen to monetize. 0:00 – Candace Owens and the Charlie Kirk Preliminary Hearing 14:17 – Debunking a Year of Conspiracy Theories 26:39 – Why the Courtroom Is Exposing the Internet's Lies 33:02 – Who Candace Owens Really Is 1:12:33 – Gnosticism, Cults, and the 30-06 Ballistics Debate 1:26:23 – How to Actually Fight Back Online 1:49:36 – Institutions, Isolationism, and the Future of the Right 1:55:53 – Jeremy Buys Back Jeremy's Razors 2:05:13 – Closing Thoughts: Agency and Building the Future Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  The "Heritage American" Movement Is Wrong — Here's Why | Ep. 41 03.07.2026 44min

  The Supreme Court just ruled in Trump v. Barbara that children born on U.S. soil to parents here illegally or temporarily are citizens at birth — upholding the standard set in 1898's Wong Kim Ark and striking down the 2025 executive order that tried to change it. The vote split the Court, Clarence Thomas filed a 91-page dissent, and Justice Alito warned the ruling could seriously affect the country's future. But the legal question the Court just settled is smaller than the philosophical one still tearing up the internet, the right, and the country underneath it: what actually makes someone American? This episode traces that question from the messy realities of the founding — a Naturalization Act that limited citizenship to "free white persons," a Catholic signer of the Declaration despite the founders' deep suspicion of Rome, a Jewish immigrant named Haym Salomon who personally financed Washington's army at Yorktown — through the waves of Irish, German, and Italian immigration that reshaped the country each time without breaking it. It examines the current backlash on the left, using Minnesota's Somali immigrant population and Dearborn, Michigan's Islamic majority as case studies in citizenship without assimilation. And it takes seriously the newer challenge from the right: the rise of "Heritage American" rhetoric, the viral "How American Are You?" ancestry chart, and dissident-right figures like Charles Cornish-Dale (Raw Egg Nationalist), C. Jay Engel, and others arguing that bloodline — not belief — is the true measure of belonging. The episode argues neither side has it right. A nation can't survive as a pure abstraction with no people actually living it out — but it also can't be reduced to bloodline, especially in a country where, as the episode notes, almost nobody has an actual unbroken, undiluted lineage to point to. Drawing on Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, G.K. Chesterton's observation that America is "the only nation in the world founded on a creed," and biblical models of covenant and assimilation — Ruth binding herself to Naomi's people, Paul's image of the wild branch grafted into a new root, Isaiah's terms for the foreigner who joins himself to the covenant — the episode makes the case that American identity has always been a covenant entered into, not a coupon handed out or a bloodline inherited. It also covers Justice Thomas's dissent in detail, including his argument that the 14th Amendment rightly secured citizenship for freedmen because they had genuine belonging, not just presence — and closes with a look at the Trump administration's historic denaturalization campaign, which aims to file more than 20 times the historical annual average of denaturalization cases this year alone. If you've watched the birthright citizenship debate, the Heritage American discourse, or the fight over what "America First" actually means and felt like both sides were missing something, this episode is the corrective. 00:00 Do You Have to Be White to Be American? 03:47 The Supreme Court Just Ruled on Citizenship 05:15 Every Nation Decides Who Counts as Its Own 07:31 America Was Never Built by One Kind of Person 10:37 The Jew Who Financed the Revolution 13:14 20 Million Immigrants, One Nation 16:07 Citizenship: A Covenant or a Coupon? 18:43 The Minnesota and Dearborn Warning Signs 24:23 The Right's Plan to Deport 120 Million 35:00 So What Is an American? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Birthright Citizenship, the Declaration, and Fighting for American Exceptionalism | Weds LIVE Ep. 40 02.07.2026 2h 4min

  America turns 250 this year, and the arguments about what this country actually is — and whether it's worth keeping — are coming from every direction at once. Jeremy opens with the Supreme Court's ruling on birthright citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment, then traces it back to a deeper question: what did the founders actually risk when they signed the Declaration of Independence, and what does America owe them 250 years later? Jeremy is joined by a panel built for exactly this moment: Eric Metaxas — NYT bestselling author of Revolution: The Birth of the Greatest Nation in the History of the World — makes the case that the American founding was the only genuine revolution in an age of so-called revolutions, and walks through what the moral character of men like Washington and Adams actually cost them. John West — VP of the Discovery Institute and author of Endowed by Our Creator — defends the Declaration of Independence against attacks from both the 1619 Project left and the dissident right's rejection of America as a "creedal nation," and unpacks what "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" meant to the founders. Rick Green — America's Constitution Coach and founder of Patriot Academy — brings the civic-action lane: why self-government requires virtue, why virtue requires biblical formation, and what ordinary Americans can actually do to keep the republic. The conversation covers American exceptionalism, the Constitution under attack, the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling and immigration, the growing rejection of the American founding from both the radical left and corners of the dissident right — including the fight over the term "Judeo-Christian" and whether America is a creed or a bloodline — and closes on where real hope for the next 250 years comes from. If you care about the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, American exceptionalism, and the fight over what this country actually is, this is the conversation for July 4th, 2026. 0:00 Monologue: What the Birthright Citizenship Ruling Really Asks 5:39 Meet the Panel: Metaxas, West & Green on the Founding 8:25 Is the American Revolution the Only One That Worked? 10:37 Chesterton's Insight: America as a Creed 15:26 Are We a Bloodline, a Place, or an Idea? 18:48 Is "It's Not a Value Judgment" a Cop-Out? 30:50 Naming the "Emerging Right" 36:12 Culture, Self-Government & the Immigration Debate 43:57 UFC, Patriot Academy & Reaching Gen Z 50:10 God-Given Rights vs. Government-Granted Rights 55:54 Is "Christian Nation" a Loaded Term? 1:00:04 Defining Christian Nationalism and "Globohomo" 1:03:26 Jefferson's "Alter or Abolish" Explained 1:10:09 Survey Data: Reasons Not to Despair 1:16:34 The Hard Work Ahead — and the Danger of Utopian Despair 1:26:10 Defending the Founders Without Excusing Slavery 1:36:45 Why Particular Men and Places Still Matter 1:44:03 Real Heroes, Caesar Rodney & Washington's Troops 1:54:12 Closing: Go See the Declaration Before It Fades Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  A Former Muslim Exposes Tucker's Lie About Islam | Ep 39 w/ Danny Burmawi 30.06.2026 1h 55min

  Why Tucker Carlson is wrong about Islam and Israel — a former Muslim breaks down the false narratives reshaping the dissident right. Danny Burmawi, CEO of the Ideological Defense Institute and author of 'Islam, Israel and the West,' explains the 14-century history of Islamic conquest, the dhimmi system, the red-green alliance, Mamdani, and why anti-Semitism and Islamophobia are not the same. If you want long-form conversations that take ideas seriously, subscribe — it's the best way to make sure you don't miss an episode. Jeremy Boreing sits down with Burmawi for a wide-ranging conversation on Islam vs. the West, Tucker Carlson's guests on Islam, the conversion that took him from devout Muslim to Christian, what really happens to apostates under Islamic law, and whether the Gulf states are truly more tolerant of Christians than Israel. 00:00 - Is Islam a Better Friend Than Israel? 01:31 - How Tucker's Guests Lie About Islam 02:56 - The 14 Centuries of Conquest 05:24 - The Blood Tax and the Stolen Churches 07:21 - Why a Cartoon Made Him Devout 11:28 - The Day He Read the Quran for Real 13:24 - What Happens When You Leave Islam 01:54:27 - Why It's 'Islamophobia,' Not Muslimophobia 01:58:08 - How the Left and Islam Became Allies 02:13:08 - Tucker, Qatar, and the Christian Lie Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Neo-Nazism Is Entering Evangelical Spaces — and Who's Fighting Back | Ep. 38 25.06.2026 2h 9min

  Last week, a neo-Nazi publishing house called Antelope Hill set up a vendor booth at a Christian conference in Ogden, Utah — and sold out. The conference was called "The War for Normal." It was organized by pastor and media figure Joel Webbon's New Christendom Press and hosted at Refuge Church by pastors Brian Sauvé and Eric Conn. Among the materials displayed and sold: The Essential Speeches of Adolf Hitler, an SS commander memoir titled Burning Souls, books originally published by the SS Main Office, handouts recommending The Turner Diaries — the neo-Nazi novel that inspired the Oklahoma City bombing — alongside swastika jewelry and literature promoting Cosmotheism, a pagan Nazi religion that places the Aryan race at the top of the natural order. When the story broke, pastor Sauvé said on the record he had "no problem" with Antelope Hill's publications. That same evening, pastor Conn posted a video to his X account featuring a Sieg Heil, Hitler Youth imagery, the founder of the American Nazi Party, and an SS officer confirming Adolf Hitler was "one hundred percent" his hero. Joel Webbon posted that he would "never" criticize the conference organizers — and then, days later, posted about Jews: "They killed the Prophets. They killed the Lord Jesus. Paul calls them 'the enemies of all mankind.'" The same week, Tucker Carlson published a 100-minute interview with theologian JD Hall — with Webbon in the studio — titled "The Corrupting Lie of Christian Zionism." In the episode, Hall argued that Christian Zionism is a 19th-century invention rooted in John Nelson Darby's dispensationalism and propagated by the Scofield Reference Bible, which he describes as effectively a Zionist operation. Hall calls Israel "a desert war cult," claims modern Judaism is a post-Temple invention with no continuity with the religion of the Old Testament, and characterizes certain Jewish prayers as prayers for the destruction of Christians. But Hall didn't stop at reframing the Jewish relationship. He went further — reframing Islam as a friend to Christianity. Hall claimed that Muslims "love Jesus." He revised the documented history of the Ottoman Empire, characterizing Muslim rulers as having been "very kind to Christians." And he argued that the reason Christians and Muslims don't get along is because of — in his words — "Jewish talking points that you see on the television and the news." These two events — Ogden and Tucker's studio — are not separate stories. They are the visible surface of a years-long ideological shift: from Israel is our ally to Jews are our enemies — and now, Muslims are our friends. The theological arguments Hall makes have ancient roots. The problem is where the same men making those arguments also stand. Doug Wilson — one of the most prominent figures in Christian nationalism — asked the right question after Ogden: why did Antelope Hill think there was a healthy market for their books at a Christian conference? Tonight, we answer that question. Joining Jeremy for this live panel: JON HARRIS (@jonharris1989) — Host of Conversations That Matter and author of Against the Waves (2025), Christianity and Social Justice (2020), and Social Justice Goes to Church (2021). MDiv from Southeastern Seminary. Ordained pastor. Has spent a decade tracking ideological infiltration of evangelical and Reformed spaces — first from the progressive left, now from the ethnonationalist right. Tonight he traces the intellectual genealogy of this movement and names the institutional failures that allowed it to take root. WILL SPENCER (@willspencer) — Stanford-educated. Grew up Jewish. Baptized 2020. Member of Reformation Presbyterian Church in Mesa, Arizona. Host of The Will Spencer Podcast and author of the most important document on this subject: "The Dangerous Secret Your Young Men Are Keeping: Neo-Nazi Thought Has Entered the Church" (Christ Over All, June 2025). In early 2024, Spencer nearly got pulled into the Stone Choir orbit — and came back to write the definitive account of how the radicalization pipeline works on real Christian men in real time. ETHAN HANSON — Making his first-ever public appearance under his real name. For years, he has been the anonymous investigative X account @not_our_guy / Hitler Hated Christ. His posts were cited as primary sources by both the Christian Post and The Bulwark in their coverage of the Refuge Church / Antelope Hill scandal. He identified the SS officer in Conn's video. He documented the Antelope Hill booth materials. He captured the Antelope Hill representative on livestream: "We're just selling Third Reich literature at a Christian conference is all." Tonight, for the first time, he's here as himself. Also discussed: Stone Choir podcast and host Cory Mahler, who has publicly stated Adolf Hitler is in Paradise, called the Holocaust "literally incredible," and — in a televised interview — did not rule out the possible need for genocide. Stone Choir claims 50,000–100,000 listeners per episode. The Antioch Declaration (November 2024) — signed by Wilson, White, Boot, Durbin, and Sandlin — affirming the Holocaust and condemning antisemitism and blood-and-soil nationalism. SBC and OPC condemnations of ethnonationalism, June 2026. The URCNA Synod Calgary debate on kinism and antisemitism. The closing question: what does a pastor say from the pulpit on Sunday to immunize his young men against this pipeline? 00:00 Neo-Nazis at a Christian Conference 04:34 Meet the Guests 07:32 Defining Christian Nationalism 09:39 The Neo-Nazi Pipeline Into Christianity 15:27 How Online Movements Get Hijacked 17:33 Is America a Proposition Nation? 23:20 Why Jews Are the Target 38:31 What's Driving the Pipeline 40:34 COVID, Conspiracies & Anti-Semitism 51:10 The Theology Behind Jew-Hatred 57:27 America Is Not Weimar 01:09:06 Evangelicalism & Why Young Men Are Leaving 01:21:06 Re-Enchantment & What Young Men Want 01:27:22 Cultural vs. Biblical Christianity 01:35:19 The Gospel & Racial Identity 01:44:59 Church, Community & Real Solutions 01:50:52 Fatherlessness & the Crisis of Authority 02:04:10 The Real Christian Response Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  JD Vance is Wrong About Aliens | Ep. 37 23.06.2026 44min

  The Trump administration has now released three tranches of declassified UAP files — 294 documents in five weeks. The Pentagon website hosting the files has received over 1.7 billion hits. Among the files is military sensor footage of objects demonstrating capabilities no known aircraft can replicate. The President calls it evidence of extraterrestrial life. His Vice President has a different theory: he thinks UFOs are actually demons. Steven Spielberg, on the other hand, says his new film about government alien cover-ups isn't science fiction. Everybody has an answer. Almost nobody is asking the right question. The right question isn't what the phenomena are. It's why we see what we see — why every age in human history has looked at unexplained lights in the sky and found confirmation of whatever it already believed. Angels in the ancient world. Demons in the medieval world. Secret weapons in World War II. Extraterrestrials in the Space Age. The phenomena didn't change. The cultural lens did. Jeremy argues that both dominant explanations — the alien hypothesis and the demonic hypothesis — are wrong, and wrong in exactly the same way: both strip human beings of their agency, their genius, and their God-given centrality in the story. One calls the powers benevolent. The other calls them malevolent. But in both cases, we are not the authors of our own history. That's not a Christian position. It's not a conservative one. And it's not true. Jeremy gets into: — Why the extraterrestrial hypothesis collapses under the very science that seems to support it, and what the actual UAP files most likely show — How our cultural operating system — built by 80 years of science fiction cinema — shapes what we see before we've processed what we're looking at — Why Tucker Carlson's demonic interpretation of UAP phenomena isn't drawn from Scripture — and what the Bible actually says about how spiritual forces operate — The reverse-engineering lie at the heart of Disclosure Day, and why attributing human technological achievement to alien or demonic sources is an insult to every scientist, engineer, and builder in history — What chronological snobbery is, why every age thinks it finally has the right answers, and why ours is no different — The biblical mandate for human agency, stewardship, and dominion — and why "someone else is running the world" has always been the oldest escape from responsibility 0:03 — The Government Releases Its UFO Files 2:21 — Aliens or Demons? The Two Competing Interpretations 4:11 — A Brief History of Unexplained Sky Phenomena 6:10 — 1947 and the Birth of Modern UFO Culture 7:34 — The Cultural Operating System 9:11 — Scientific Naturalism and the Alien Imagination 12:07 — Reviewing Disclosure Day: Spielberg's New Film 27:56 — Both Views Are Fundamentally Anti-Human 28:50 — Demons Didn't Split the Atom 32:17 — Ancient Aliens and the Insult to Human Ingenuity 34:38 — Occam's Razor and the Limits of Speculation 36:30 — The Anthropocentric Framework 38:22 — Human Agency, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Gnostic Temptation 41:05 — Conclusion: The World Is Ours Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  He Spent 14 Years in the Anti-Semitism Movement. Here's What Finally Broke Him. | Ep 36. w/ Lucas Gage 18.06.2026 2h 30min

  Lucas Gage is a Marine veteran who spent 14 years as one of the most prominent voices in what he calls the "JQ movement" — the “Jewish Question” — the online community built around antisemitism. He appeared on David Duke's program. He built a following of hundreds of thousands. He helped create the conspiracy-minded, anti-Israel wing of what is now called the dissident right. Now he’s walking away publicly at what he says is a high personal cost. In this conversation, Lucas and Jeremy trace how it started — 9/11, the WMD lie, Alex Jones, David Icke, and the pipeline from conspiracy theory to organized antisemitism. They talk about the specific moments that broke the spell: a crypto scam by a fellow traveler, a defamation by another, and Charlie Kirk assassination theories so unhinged they produced radicalization fatigue even in Lucas. We discuss audience capture, the economics of outrage, and how the same algorithms that empowered the dissident right are now actively making it more extreme and less coherent. They don't agree on everything. They argue about Gaza. They argue about Iraq. They push back where they disagree. But this is one of the most unusual conversations Jeremy has had on this show — and one of the most important. There are thousands of young men exactly like Lucas, disillusioned and looking for meaning and truth in all the wrong places. Lucas hopes that by publicly correcting himself, he can help other men do the same.  Lucas's message to his former audience: Fact-check the people you trust. It's okay to be wrong. Let it go. 0:00 Introduction 0:01 "Low IQ" vs. "High IQ" Anti-Semitism 2:51 The Three Things That Broke the Spell 6:19 What Is the JQ Movement? 7:18 The Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories 9:52 Origin Story: 9/11, WMDs, and the Conspiracy Pipeline 13:06 White Nationalism, Name Changes, and the Trump Train 16:19 "We've Seen This Before" — Is This Transformation Real? 50:14 The Table Analogy: Knowing Everything and Missing the Obvious 54:00 Trauma, Victimhood, and the Psychology of Radicalization 1:21:47 Was Iraq a Lie? 1:27:43 The Economics of Rage: How Money Ruined the Movement 1:48:31 Gaza: Where Jeremy and Lucas Disagree 2:00:36 Are Jews a Monolith? 2:21:22 What Lucas Wants to Be Remembered Fo Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  A Horrific Report Out of the UK – and What It Means for America | Weds LIVE Ep. 35 17.06.2026 1h 56min

  American greatness has enemies. Some are foreign — a nuclear deal struck in secret, terms the public hasn’t seen, a 60-day window before we find out whether the framework holds. Some are civilizational — a 219-page parliamentary inquiry confirming that at least 250,000 girls were systematically raped across the UK while institutions looked away, paralyzed by fear of being called racist. And some are internal — a fractured Right that can’t agree on what it’s trying to conserve, or whether it’s worth conserving at all. This week, we watched as thousands of foreign visitors attended the World Cup in America and were dazzled by our beautiful country. It was a wholesome reminder of what we’re fighting for, and what we lose if the enemies of the West win.  Tonight, Jeremy Boreing is joined by Katie Pavlich, Karol Markowicz, and Bethany Mandel to name the threats, connect the threads, and ask the question that runs underneath all of it: what does it actually take to protect and preserve what makes America worth defending? Jeremy gets into: The Iran MOU — what’s in it, what’s contradicted, what Israel wasn’t told, and why the Senate’s silence matters The UK rape gang inquiry: 219 pages, at least 149 local authority districts, and institutions that chose self-protection over the safety of children The thread connecting both stories — and why Jeremy names it directly What the World Cup is revealing: millions of Europeans discovering America for the first time and loving what they find The broader question: what does it take for the American Right to preserve and advance what’s worth preserving — in its current fractured state? Katie Pavlich hosts Katie Pavlich Tonight on NewsNation and is the author of the New York Times bestseller Fast and Furious. Karol Markowicz is a columnist for the New York Post and co-host of the Karol Markowicz Show. Bethany Mandel is a conservative columnist and homeschooling mother of six. Together, Karol and Bethany are the co-authors of Stolen Youth, a national bestseller published by The Daily Wire. 00:00 Introduction 00:51 UK Rape Gang Report: 250,000 Victims 04:50 Iran Deal: Snatching Defeat From Victory? 09:14 Iran, Drones, and America's Military Readiness 13:22 Can Israel Even Agree to This Deal? 17:37 JD Vance, 2028, and the Soul of MAGA 27:37 Charlie Kirk's Betrayal and the Big Tent Problem 35:11 What MAGA Actually Stands For 41:23 Tucker vs. Shapiro: The Real Disagreement Is America 47:17 The Woke Right, Catholicism, and Ends Justify the Means 57:22 Could UK Rape Gangs Happen in America? 1:02:59 Expert Culture, Therapy, and Anti-American Thinking 1:09:17 Birth Rates, Bad Ideas, and the Anti-Natalist Lie 1:23:13 Therapy Culture Is Anti-God and Anti-American 1:32:38 Europeans Discover Real America at the World Cup 1:38:08 Trad Larping, Gen Z, and Finding the Real Future Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Colin Wright Convinced a $1.8 Billion Institution to Fix Science | Ep. 34 11.06.2026 1h 43min

  The peer review system that governs scientific publishing was built to be an immune system — a self-correcting mechanism to keep bad science from becoming policy. It isn't working. In fields captured by ideology, particularly gender medicine, the correction mechanism has been reversed: papers that confirm the approved narrative sail through, while letters to the editor challenging them are ghosted, buried in endless limbo, or sent back to the same reviewers who approved the original paper. Dissent doesn't get published. It disappears. And in the absence of peer-reviewed counter-evidence, judges, policymakers, and medical boards treat the silence as consensus. Colin Wright has been fighting this for eight years. He left academic biology rather than write DEI statements affirming things he knew to be false. He was canceled at peak cancel culture for publishing — in Quillette and the Wall Street Journal — a simple biological claim: there are exactly two sexes. He watched papers that would have been laughed out of any rigorous review process get cited by the American Academy of Pediatrics, referenced in federal court cases, and used to justify irreversible medical procedures on minors. And rather than opt out of the system or fight it from the outside, he built something new inside it. Colin and Theory and Society editor-in-chief Kevin McCaffrey announced a first-of-its-kind post-publication peer review system through Springer Nature — a $1.8 billion academic institution. The system lets anyone submit a formal peer review of any published paper, routes it through an editorial process that evaluates argument quality rather than ideological alignment, and includes a built-in right of reply. If the original authors respond within a month, both pieces publish simultaneously. If they don't, the criticism publishes anyway. The veto that has been silencing dissent is gone. Jeremy gets into: - How peer review works when it works — and the specific ways ideological capture has broken it in gender medicine and related fields - The pipeline from flawed academic paper to AMA guidelines to federal court precedent — and why the absence of published counter-evidence is used as evidence of consensus - The multivariate animal sex paper, the brine shrimp wedding, and other examples of ideologically captured research that passed peer review and are now being cited in policy - How Theory and Society's post-publication peer review system works, what makes it structurally different from existing letter-to-the-editor processes, and why the right-of-reply guarantee changes everything - Colin's one policy recommendation: tie federal research funding to journals that don't require positionality statements or ideological terminology — and why that alone could restructure the incentive system - Colin's personal biography: flunking out of community college, losing his academic career at peak cancel culture, moving back in with his parents to become a fitness influencer — and the series of setbacks that led to the most consequential work of his career - Why the X comparison holds: just as one free speech platform changed the speech policies of every other platform, one journal willing to publish dissent may be enough to force the rest of the system to reform Also referenced: Christina Buttons, James Lindsay, Gordon Guyatt, James Nuzzo, Claire Lehman (Quillette), Kevin McCaffrey (Theory and Society). 00:00 Introduction 00:53 Is the Peer Review System Broken? 03:15 When Politics Corrupts Hard Science 05:30 How Peer Review Actually Works 09:08 How Ideological Capture Destroys Science 13:04 How Bad Science Becomes Real Policy 22:07 Colin Wright's New Post-Publication Peer Review System 30:26 Responding to Critics of the New Journal 41:37 The Scale of the Problem 48:38 The One Policy Change That Could Fix Everything 53:17 Did Peer Review Ever Actually Work? 55:54 The Craziest Papers Ever Published 59:56 How Colin Wright Got Here 1:08:41 Canceled at Peak Cancel Culture 1:16:11 Why Colin Refused to Compromise on Truth 1:22:29 The Betrayal of Academia 1:32:45 COVID, DEI, and the Full Corruption of Science 1:36:01 What Colin Wright Hopes His Legacy Will Be Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Iran, Massie, Karmelo Anthony and the Politics of Despair | Ep. 33 11.06.2026 2h 43min

  Congress just handed a conspiracy theory a credential it will never lose. On Monday, on the 59th anniversary of the USS Liberty attack, Thomas Massie — a lame-duck congressman with nothing left to lose — stood on the floor of the United States House of Representatives and entered an antisemitic conspiracy theory into the Congressional Record. The claim: that Israel deliberately murdered American sailors in 1967, and that the U.S. government covered it up. That claim has lived for decades in the fever swamps of fringe blogs and crackpot influencers. Now it lives in the Congressional Record forever. That same week: President Trump resumed strikes on Iran after an American Apache helicopter was downed, and already Alex Jones and others on the conspiratorial Right are suggesting its a false flag operation by Israel. And a jury in Collin County convicted Karmelo Anthony of murder — and the social feeds filled immediately leftists are demanding his release along racial lines, while Nick Fuentes is calling for whites to mirror that same racial solidarity. The left and the dissident right are not opposites. They are competing brands of the same product — despair, blame, and the conviction that the only way forward is to burn it down. The left packages it as systemic oppression. The dissident right packages it as stolen greatness. The destination is the same: a person who has surrendered his agency to whichever movement most convincingly tells him he was wronged. But Jeremy believes we can build a better future. Not as a naive refusal to see the problems — but as the conviction, grounded in faith, that your choices still matter, that building is still possible, and that the future belongs to those who build it. Tonight, Jeremy is joined by the team making that case from the inside. Jeremy gets into: --Why Massie's USS Liberty speech is more dangerous than its content — and what the venue tells you about where the dissident right is heading --The convergence of the left and the dissident right: same ideology, different packaging --Why Jeremy launched this show — not because he wanted a podcast, but because an object in motion is more generative than an object at rest --How Boreing Media thinks about AI, editorial standards, and building institutions that don't drift toward audience capture --What the conservative movement actually has to do in the next two years to avoid handing power back to the left Guests: Alyssa Cordova (Executive Producer, The Jeremy Boreing Show), Jon Lewis (President, Boreing Media), Joel Berry (Senior Producer, The Jeremy Boreing Show; former Managing Editor, The Babylon Bee) 00:00 Introduction – USS Liberty, Thomas Massey & the Dissident Right 02:16 Carmelo Anthony Verdict & the Left-Right Convergence 03:49 Jeremy's Story: Leaving The Daily Wire & Starting Over 06:41 Why Jeremy Launched This Show 08:01 The Conservative Movement in Crisis 09:15 Meet the Team: John Lewis, Joel Berry & Alyssa Cordova 17:03 What Makes the Daily Wire Different: A Culture of Winning 23:49 Mission Over Role: Rightly Ordering Your Priorities 28:29 Work as Worship: The Protestant Work Ethic & Calling 36:28 Parasocial Relationships – Good, Bad & the President Parallel 47:22 Every Job Has a Mission – Plumbers, Tombstone Sellers & Sandwich Makers 01:02:57 AI, Filmmaking & the Future of Media 01:09:46 Breaking Down the Team's Daily Reality 01:22:31 Audience Q&A: Where Does the Political Chaos End? 01:37:52 Audience Q&A: Husband, Wife & Competing Callings 02:02:57 Audience Q&A: Thoughts on AI Filmmaking 02:18:36 Audience Q&A: What Matters Most in Friendship 02:37:01 The Bent Key – Debunking a Fan Conspiracy Theory Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  Tucker, Candace, and Massie Are Lying to You About the USS Liberty | Ep. 32 08.06.2026 53min

  Today marks the fifty-ninth anniversary of the attack on the USS Liberty.  Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Thomas Massie and their ilk have been pushing a conspiracy theory about what happened on June 8th, 1967 — and they’re lying to you about what really happened.  This is Jeremy's definitive debunking of the USS Liberty conspiracy theory: what the evidence actually shows, why the false flag narrative doesn't survive scrutiny, and why the dissident Right is pushing lies about the tragic deaths of 34 American sailors. On June 8th, 1967, Israeli forces attacked the USS Liberty, a U.S. Navy intelligence ship operating in the eastern Mediterranean near the Sinai coast. Thirty-four Americans were killed. One hundred and seventy-one were wounded. Every official investigation that followed — the Navy Court of Inquiry, CIA analysis, the NSA's declassified intercepts, the Clark Clifford report, the Joint Chiefs review, and multiple congressional investigations — reached the same conclusion: the attack was a tragic case of mistaken identity. Friendly fire in the fog of war. That verdict has never been overturned. The USS Liberty conspiracy theory exists not because the evidence supports it, but because the evidence has been systematically misrepresented by people with an agenda. Jeremy gets into: the eight specific claims made by USS Liberty conspiracy theorists and why none of them hold up — the American flag argument, the NSA tapes, the "unmistakable ship" claim, the life raft machine-gunning allegation, the rescue plane recall, the Ward Boston affidavit, the 2003 Moorer Commission, and the cover-up theory; the Gish Gallop — the debate tactic of substituting volume of weak claims for the strength of any single argument, and how it drives every USS Liberty conspiracy conversation; the strategic context of June 1967 — Egypt, Syria, and Jordan massed on Israel's borders with the stated aim of annihilation, Soviet client states throughout the Arab world, and Lyndon Johnson's overriding fear of a great power confrontation with the USSR; how the USS Liberty came to be in the eastern Mediterranean and why it never received Navy orders to withdraw from the combat zone; Dr. Marvin Nowicki, the NSA's chief Hebrew linguist aboard an EC-121 spy plane recording Israeli communications in real time, and what the declassified NSA intercepts actually show; USS Liberty captain William McGonagle — Congressional Medal of Honor recipient — and his sworn contemporaneous testimony versus the survivor narratives that evolved over decades; Lloyd Painter's contradictory accounts and what the science of trauma memory tells us about eyewitness testimony from combat survivors; Admiral Thomas Moorer and the 2003 "Independent Commission of Inquiry" — no subpoena power, no access to classified material, funded by the USS Liberty Veterans Association, and why a private citizen's opinion is not the same as an official finding; the motive problem — why neither the "false flag to drag America into war" theory nor the "silence the NSA" theory survives contact with the actual strategic situation of June 1967; Iran's documented exploitation of the USS Liberty anniversary, including a coordinated campaign of over 2,000 Iranian accounts pushing antisemitic narratives at American audiences, documented by the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab; the Soviet-era origins of anti-Zionist propaganda and how those narratives migrated to Tucker Carlson's program, Candace Owens's platform, and Nick Fuentes; antisemitism as a conspiracy framework and why the USS Liberty has become one of the most respectable vehicles for it on the American right; and what Thomas Massie's planned House floor speech actually represents — and why a sitting congressman using American sailors' deaths to suggest Jewish power overrides American democracy is something the right needs to reckon with. Also referenced: Admiral Lawrence Geis, Admiral Kidd, Robert McNamara, Phil Turney, Dwight Porter, Russell David, Ward Boston, hull number GTR-5, Operation Cyanide, the State Department Foreign Relations historical volume, the USS Liberty Veterans Association, the Six-Day War, the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, Desert Storm friendly fire, the Battle of Antietam, the Battle of Germantown, Stonewall Jackson, and Pat Tillman. 0:00 The Attack on the USS Liberty 1:12 How a Tragedy Became a Weapon 2:27 What Is a Conspiracy Theory? 3:36 The Strategic Context of June 1967 6:40 How the Attack Actually Happened 8:42 Friendly Fire Is Not Rare 10:29 The 8 Claims — And Why They Fail 24:37 The Motive Problem 27:54 The Survivors Deserve the Truth 33:00 Where This Conspiracy Actually Came From 35:14 Why the Jewish People Are Always the Villain 41:26 What This Is Really About Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
• 
  3 Waves of Left-Wing Violence in America — We're in the 3rd One Now | Ep. 31 with Noah Rothman 05.06.2026 1h 39min

  The Southern Poverty Law Center calls it a myth. Most American institutions act as if it doesn't exist. But Noah Rothman's case is that the United States is in the middle of its third major wave of left-wing political violence in the last century — and the polling, the assassinations, and the institutional response all tell the story of a society losing the social taboo that has historically held this kind of violence in check. Jeremy is joined by Noah Rothman — Senior Writer at National Review, columnist, and author of three books, including the brand-new Blood and Progress: A Century of Left-Wing Violence, alongside The Rise of the New Puritans and Unjust: Social Justice and the Unmaking of America. Noah is one of the few Trump-skeptical voices on the right who has continued to keep his eyes locked on the threat from the left even as conservative media has, in some quarters, drifted toward its own conspiracies and grievances. They get into: the three historical waves of left-wing violence in America — the anarchist and socialist violence of the 1910s and 1920s, the Marxian guerrilla movements of the late 1960s, '70s, and '80s, and the wave we are inside of right now; why the SPLC and most academic databases of "political violence" double-count prison fights and homeless-person epithets to manufacture a top-line that the right is uniquely violent; the rhetorical tactic Noah calls "the pregnant 'but'" — how Bernie Sanders, AOC, Elizabeth Warren, and Chris Murphy all condemned Brian Thompson's murder and then immediately appended a "but" justifying it; the Charlie Kirk assassination and the institutional left's largely respectful response versus the campus and online cheering, the Saturday Night Live applause for the name Luigi Mangione, and the conspiracy ecosystem on the dissident right (Candace Owens, Ian Carroll, and the Epstein-pedophile-class framings) that now exists in symmetry with it; the Network Contagion Research Institute polls showing 50% of self-identified left-of-center Americans say it is at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk, and 56% say the same about Donald Trump; the three publicly known attempts on Trump's life and Norah O'Donnell asking the President on CBS to respond to his would-be killer's manifesto; January 6 and the BLM 2020 riots as comparative case studies in mob violence, the blanket pardons issued by both Joe Biden and Donald Trump, and why blanket pardons are never a good idea; Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn — the Weather Underground revolutionaries who killed people, never went to prison, and got tenure at major universities — and Alexander Berkman, Howard Zinn, and the Marxian intellectual lineage that fed them; Helen Andrews's "feminization of society" thesis and whether the rise of female representation in hegemonic left-wing institutions tracks with the rise in intolerance and willingness to censor; the strange evolution by which Marxists became Pan-Arab Baathists became Islamists, the Red-Green Alliance, and Jason Burke's The Revolutionists as the international companion text; the Sarah Milgrom and Yaron Lischinsky shooting in Washington and the textbook Marxian writings of Elias Rodriguez; the Soviet-era "Zionology" academic project that invented most of the anti-Israel narratives that now circulate on college campuses (white settler colonialism, brown-South genocide, rape as a weapon of war); two "cellphone moments" America is failing to reckon with — COVID accountability, foreclosed when Trump became the 2024 nominee, and the Charlie Kirk assassination, foreclosed by the dissident right's choice to build conspiracies instead of confronting left-wing violence; Tucker Carlson, the Catholic integralists, and the rise of "rhetorical statue-toppling" on the right; and Noah's recommendations on what actually works — civic education, law-enforcement modeling, and the patient, unglamorous restoration of the social taboo around political violence. 01:02 Is America Living Through a Wave of Left-Wing Violence?  02:13 The SPLC Calls It a Myth  06:17 The Three Waves: Anarchists, Marxian Guerrillas, and Now  08:27 The Psychology of Political Violence  10:27 Luigi, Brian Thompson, and the Permission Structure  13:06 How the Databases Erase Left-Wing Violence  43:45 What Ended the Last Two Waves  47:15 Why Wealth and Education Make Us More Vulnerable  01:14:40 How the Right Is Blowing Its Own Moment on Charlie Kirk  01:33:47 What Can Actually Be Done Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices