True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Епизоде

• 
  What JP Miller Did While Mica’s Family Fought for Change 21.09.2026 37мин

  Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott keeps this combined episode focused on the pattern Mica Miller’s family says the law repeatedly failed to capture. Mica left journals, diaries and police reports describing alleged control over medication, unwanted injections, sleep deprivation, tracking and harassment. Scott explains why coercive control is often missed when institutions evaluate each incident on its own instead of asking whether one person is steadily stripping away another person’s choices. That is the problem Mica’s Law is designed to address. South Carolina’s SB 702 would add coercive control to the state’s domestic-violence framework and make repeated controlling behavior a criminal offense. The bill stalled during the 2026 session and remains unpassed. Scott examines what that gap means for families who can describe an entire pattern but cannot point to one statute that names it. JP Miller is now charged federally with cyberstalking and making false statements. Prosecutors allege that from November 2022 through April 27, 2024, he repeatedly contacted Mica, interfered with her finances and daily activities, damaged her tires, posted an intimate image without consent and caused tracking devices to be placed on her vehicle. JP has pleaded not guilty and has not been charged in connection with Mica’s death. His case is scheduled for the October 2026 federal trial term. The second half of the episode looks at what came next. JP married Suzie Skinner in June 2025. Suzie’s former husband Chris Skinner died in a pool in September 2021, and authorities ruled the drowning accidental. His family has publicly questioned that ruling, while reporting says the case has been revisited. No one has been charged in Chris Skinner’s death. Netflix interviewees have alleged JP and Suzie were involved before Mica died; JP has denied that and said the relationship began later. Scott looks at why a new relationship can become part of an alleged controller’s public reset while making clear that remarriage itself proves nothing about criminal conduct. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #MicaMiller #JPMiller #TrueCrimeToday #ShavaunScott #MicasLaw #CoerciveControl #SuzieSkinner #Cyberstalking #FederalTrial #TrueCrime 
• 
  JP Miller Called Kaufman His Best Friend Before WHAT?! 20.09.2026 49мин

  The Mica Miller Netflix documentary revived one old label that has a very different September 2026 answer attached to it. JP Miller called Mark Kaufman his best friend from the Solid Rock pulpit, while Kaufman's September statement says JP was never part of the core friend group he regularly spent time with. Kaufman was not a stranger on the edge of the story. He served as best man at JP and Mica's 2017 wedding, where archival video captured him joking about JP forcing him into the friendship. On the morning after Mica died, JP again used the best-friend label publicly before Kaufman sang during the church service. In September 2026, Kaufman pushed back on how that relationship has been portrayed. He says he never witnessed mistreatment of Mica, denies claims that he helped JP pursue another woman, and says he has cut ties with JP and the church. Reporting says their business connection also ended when JP's minority interest in Crocodile Rocks was bought out in late 2025. The second half of this combined episode goes back to the May 5, 2024 memorial, where JP said he had spent time beside Mica's body on several occasions and claimed he tried to raise her from the dead. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke examines the psychology behind loyalty, denial, coercive-control allegations, and the public distancing that can follow when a closed community becomes the subject of federal scrutiny and national media attention. Federal prosecutors accuse JP of cyberstalking Mica and lying to investigators. The indictment alleges conduct beginning in November 2022, including tracking devices, more than 50 contacts in one day, financial interference, an intimate image posted without consent, and a tire-deflation device. JP pleaded not guilty, has not been charged in Mica's death, and is awaiting trial in the October 2026 term. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #MicaMiller #JPMiller #TrueCrimeToday #MarkKaufman #RobinDreeke #DeathOfThePastorsWife #SolidRockChurch #FederalCase #Cyberstalking #TrueCrimeNews 
• 
  Lindsay Clancy’s Hung Jury Could Trigger WHAT Next?! 20.09.2026 35мин

  Lindsay Clancy's hung jury left the Commonwealth with the option of trying the case again, but Kevin Reddington is asking the court to stop that path before it starts. The September 29 hearing will address a Rule 25 motion along with the defense's broader attack on the necessity of the mistrial. The two arguments are not interchangeable. Rule 25 concerns whether the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law. Reddington's double-jeopardy position asks whether the mistrial itself was necessary after one juror prevented unanimity despite reportedly acknowledging reasonable doubt. The record from the final days of deliberations gives both sides something to point to. The jury reported that a member was not applying the reasonable-doubt instruction. Reddington wanted the juror removed. Judge William Sullivan declined because Massachusetts law sharply limits when a deliberating juror can be discharged, especially when the dispute may involve the juror's view of the evidence. The instructions also contained language pulling in different directions during a deadlock. Jurors were told to follow the law as the judge gave it. They were also told that a verdict must remain the result of each juror's own convictions. The charge then made clear that a remaining reasonable doubt requires acquittal. Defense attorney Bob Motta analyzes how those instructions could shape the post-mistrial fight and what the judge can actually do under Rule 25. The prosecution has not announced its retrial decision. September 29 therefore becomes more than a scheduling date: it is the first test of whether this case moves toward another jury or toward a legal ending in the same courtroom. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #HungJury #Rule25 #DoubleJeopardy #JuryInstructions #Mistrial #TrueCrime 
• 
  Farwell Heads to Trial After Death Ruling Changed HOW?! 20.09.2026 38мин

  Matthew Farwell is heading toward trial with two competing stories about Sandra Birchmore’s death and an official record that has already changed. The Massachusetts medical examiner originally ruled suicide. In April 2026, the office amended the manner of death to undetermined and changed the cause from asphyxia by hanging to asphyxia. Farwell’s lawyers maintain Sandra killed herself. A federal judge has ruled that they may introduce evidence about her mental-health struggles and history of suicidal thoughts. Prosecutors will argue that the case cannot be reduced to those records. They allege Farwell used his authority in the Stoughton Police Explorers program to begin an unlawful relationship with Sandra when she was 15 and later killed her to stop disclosure. Sandra had joined the youth program at 12. A later Stoughton internal investigation found that Matthew Farwell, his twin brother William, and former deputy chief Robert Devine had inappropriate relationships with her. William Farwell and Devine have not been charged in the federal prosecution. The early handling of Sandra’s death is also expected to matter. Federal prosecutors say local officers told the medical examiner there was “no foul play” within about an hour of finding her body. They say investigators did not compel Farwell’s DNA and did not seize his electronic devices during the first investigation. Federal investigators later returned to the evidence. Prosecutors have said testing showed Farwell was a major DNA contributor on the duffel-bag strap found at the scene. Defense lawyers say the strap contained a complex mixture and dispute the government’s interpretation. Farwell has pleaded not guilty to charges of killing a witness and causing the death of Sandra’s unborn son. The defense says suicide. The prosecution alleges homicide and staging. Jury selection is scheduled for October 5, 2026. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #TrueCrimeToday #Birchmore #FarwellTrial #StoughtonPolice #FederalTrial #Massachusetts #TrueCrime #JusticeForSandra 
• 
  Donna Adelson Suggested WHAT After Wendi Lost in Court?! 20.09.2026 51мин

  Donna Adelson’s emails and family testimony became central evidence in the Dan Markel murder trial because they showed what followed the court ruling that kept Wendi Adelson and her sons in Tallahassee. Wendi testified that Donna pushed ideas aimed at pressuring Markel, including baptizing the children as Christians, dressing them in Hitler Youth uniforms, and offering him $1 million to permit the relocation. Wendi’s description of her mother was equally direct. She told jurors Donna “micromanaged my life.” Robert Adelson testified that Donna was on the controlling side and “ran the show.” His testimony described a mother who stayed deeply involved in the choices of her adult children and expected compliance when she had decided how something should go. Charlie Adelson’s relationship with Donna became another part of that picture. After Charlie was convicted in 2023 of murder, conspiracy, and solicitation, detention records showed 86 calls to Donna’s phone number in seven days. Those calls totaled 2,118 minutes. At Donna’s trial, financial investigator Mary Hull testified that Donna had also managed hotels, flights, and bills for Charlie. Katherine Magbanua testified that Charlie sometimes stepped away to contact Donna during discussions about the murder plot. She also told jurors that Charlie said Donna washed cash that was damp and moldy. Magbanua testified that she received 44 checks from the Adelson dental practice despite never working there. The defense maintained Donna wrote the checks at Charlie’s direction and rejected the prosecution’s interpretation of those payments. A Florida jury convicted Donna in 2025 of first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation for orchestrating Markel’s killing. She received a life sentence. Her direct appeal remains open before Florida’s First District Court of Appeal, making the appellate record the next place the case will be tested. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrimeToday #WendiAdelson #CharlieAdelson #AdelsonFamily #MurderForHire #FloridaCrime #Tallahassee #TrueCrime 
• 
  How Shavaun Scott Reads JP Miller’s "Protection" Claim 20.09.2026 30мин

  Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott is the key voice in this combined episode on JP Miller, Mica Miller and the rise-and-fall story of Solid Rock Church. Her focus is the concept of carewashing: the way an alleged controller can take surveillance, pressure and boundary-breaking conduct and rebrand it as concern. According to federal prosecutors, Miller said he used a private investigator to monitor Mica in order to keep her safe. Scott explains why that kind of explanation can be persuasive to outsiders even when the behavior allegedly points in the opposite direction. That same framework helps make sense of the church story. Public reporting in 2023 described a ministry with significant holdings — roughly $5.59 million in property and related assets, including the church campus, acreage, vehicles and an airplane. By late 2024, Solid Rock Church and its school had closed, the main property had sold, and former church elders were publicly saying they had never been given a clear picture of the church’s finances. Meanwhile, JP continued preaching to a much smaller group at rotating locations. The federal indictment charges Miller with cyberstalking and making false statements and alleges conduct from November 2022 through April 27, 2024. Prosecutors say that conduct included unwanted contact, interference with Mica’s finances and daily life, tire damage, an intimate image posted without consent and tracking devices placed on her vehicle. Miller has pleaded not guilty, has not been charged in connection with Mica’s death and is set for the October 2026 trial term. Shavaun Scott’s analysis keeps the episode from becoming just another timeline recap. She looks at how institutions can confuse loyalty with morality and how people inside a system can start defending conduct they would instantly recognize as alarming anywhere else. The result is one story with two tracks: what prosecutors say JP Miller did to Mica, and what happened to the church structure that once centered him, funded him and, according to former insiders, revealed far less to its members than many thought. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #MicaMiller #JPMiller #TrueCrimeToday #ShavaunScott #SolidRockChurch #Carewashing #Cyberstalking #FederalTrial #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime 
• 
  JP Miller’s Place in Mica’s First Wedding Was WHAT?! 19.09.2026 40мин

  JP Miller was part of Mica Miller’s first marriage before he became her second husband. He officiated her 2012 wedding to Jeremy Deas after Mica had already spent years inside the Solid Rock Church community in Myrtle Beach. Mica began attending the church as a teenager. She later became a worship leader, and reporting and court records place her working for JP’s family. JP was roughly fifteen years older and served as pastor, mentor and employer before their relationship changed and they married in November 2017. The later federal allegations make that earlier power structure impossible to ignore. A grand jury indicted JP in December 2025 on cyberstalking and false-statement charges. Prosecutors allege that between November 2022 and April 27, 2024, he repeatedly contacted Mica, interfered with her finances and daily activities, damaged her tires, posted an intimate image without permission and caused tracking devices to be placed on her vehicle. He has pleaded not guilty and has not been charged in connection with her death. Trial is set for the October 2026 federal term. Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines how investigators separate disturbing relationship history from evidence that can actually support a criminal charge. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the social environment around a dominant leader and how group loyalty can discourage questions until the consequences become impossible to dismiss. Former Solid Rock members have publicly described raising concerns about JP and feeling dismissed. Netflix’s Death of the Pastor’s Wife also portrays a congregation split over what members believed and whom they trusted. The federal indictment does not identify church members as charged participants. That leaves two different tracks: what prosecutors say JP did, and what the people around him may have seen before federal investigators entered the picture. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #MicaMiller #JPMiller #TrueCrimeToday #SolidRockChurch #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Cyberstalking #JenniferCoffindaffer #ShavaunScott #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime 
• 
  Lindsay Clancy Jury Room: What Did the Holdout Pick Up?! 19.09.2026 35мин

  Lindsay Clancy jury room testimony after the mistrial is raising new questions about how the lone holdout behaved while twelve jurors tried to reach a unanimous verdict. Public interviews with jurors describe an 11-1 final split, repeated arguments over reasonable doubt, and a startling use of evidence during deliberations. Juror Nick Dargie told ABC News that the holdout sometimes disengaged while others were speaking and scrolled on his phone. Dargie says he asked the man to identify testimony or evidence supporting his position and did not get an answer he found responsive. He also says the holdout removed an exercise band from the evidence bag, tied it around a water bottle, and pulled on it. Dargie described the behavior as shocking and inappropriate for the seriousness of the case. Jury foreperson Roni Carlson has described another pivotal moment. She says the holdout acknowledged reasonable doubt about Clancy's criminal responsibility. Carlson began filling out and signing three verdict forms because she thought the jury had finally reached agreement. According to Carlson, the holdout then refused to join a not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity verdict. The jury later complained to Judge William Sullivan that one member was not following the court's reasonable-doubt instruction. Sullivan questioned jurors and re-read the applicable law. The defense sought the holdout's removal, but Sullivan kept the jury intact. After roughly 38 hours of deliberation across seven days, he declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski to examine what a lone holdout can experience inside a divided jury. They also look at why pressure can harden a position and how emotionally overwhelming evidence can affect jurors applying a legal standard. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #RobinDreeke #HoldoutJuror #JuryDeliberations #Mistrial #ReasonableDoubt #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime
• 
  Why Mica Miller’s Friend Says She Feared JP Miller 19.09.2026 35мин

  The Mica Miller case returned to national attention after Netflix’s Death of the Pastor’s Wife gave her friends and family room to describe what they say Mica was telling them before April 27, 2024. One friend says Mica expressed a specific fear involving JP Miller, a statement that now lands against a separate federal indictment alleging cyberstalking. Mica’s death at Lumber River State Park was ruled a suicide, and JP Miller has not been charged with causing it. Her divorce attorney has said Mica was discussing a new start the day before she died, while the medical examiner’s report recorded no signs of a struggle where shell casings were recovered. Those facts remain part of the official record even as Mica’s loved ones continue to question how her final weeks unfolded. Federal prosecutors are asking a jury to decide something narrower. They allege JP engaged in cyberstalking from November 2022 through Mica’s death, including unwanted communications, tracking devices, financial interference, repeated contacts, and an incident involving her vehicle tires. They also accuse him of lying to federal investigators; he has pleaded not guilty. The federal indictment carries a maximum of five years on the cyberstalking charge and two years on the false-statement count if Miller is convicted. He remains free on bond while the case waits for the October 2026 term. Jennifer Coffindaffer, a former FBI Special Agent, explains why the distinction matters. The federal trial can test the government’s cyberstalking and false-statement allegations, but it is not a homicide case and cannot be treated as one. The result is a story with an official cause-of-death ruling, a pending federal prosecution, and a friend’s account of what Mica said she feared before either became public. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #MicaMiller #JPMiller #TrueCrimeToday #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Cyberstalking #FederalTrial #Netflix #JenniferCoffindaffer #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime 
• 
  D4vd's Security Guard Is Accused of WHAT?! 19.09.2026 52мин

  D4vd Celeste Rivas Hernandez wrongful death case — the family's civil complaint focuses new attention on the people who allegedly helped create access, transportation, housing, and financial support around David Anthony Burke. Twelve causes of action now sit beside the criminal case, with Burke's mother, management figures, security guard, and business entities among the named defendants. Sheldon Jacques is one of the most important names in the complaint. Celeste's parents allege the live-in security guard helped remove her from her family home and transport her to Burke's Hollywood Hills residence. The lawsuit further alleges that people around Burke knew or should have known Celeste was a minor and failed to take reasonable steps to protect her. The family's civil theory also follows the money. Colleen Burke is accused of handling parts of her son's finances and approving expenses tied to his business operations. At the criminal preliminary hearing, a former financial manager testified that Burke generated roughly $10 million to $11.5 million in gross earnings between 2023 and 2025. Property records later showed two Texas properties transferred into his mother's name after Celeste's remains were discovered. Burke has pleaded not guilty to the criminal charges. A judge ordered him to stand trial after a July preliminary hearing, and he remains jailed without bail. His private attorneys withdrew in August and he is now represented by a public defender. The next scheduled status conference is October 19, 2026. Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to explain why the civil suit matters before any damages are decided. Discovery can force document production and sworn testimony, and the complaint's allegations put the conduct of Burke's surrounding adults under a level of scrutiny that the criminal case may not require to resolve Burke's guilt or innocence. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #CelesteRivasHernandez #D4vd #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #WrongfulDeath #DavidAnthonyBurke #SheldonJacques #ColleenBurke #CivilLawsuit #TrueCrime 
• 
  JP Miller’s Pattern Goes WAY Beyond Narcissism 19.09.2026 28мин

  Everyone watching the Netflix documentary calls JP Miller a narcissist, but the federal indictment, the civil lawsuits, the sworn affidavits, and three decades of documented behavior describe something the published research treats as a different category entirely. Federal prosecutors allege Miller ran a seventeen-month cyberstalking campaign against Mica Miller — tracking devices on her vehicles, more than fifty calls in one day, her nude photo posted online without consent, interference with her money and her daily life. He has pleaded not guilty. Her death was officially ruled a suicide and he has not been charged in it. Two women allege in civil complaints that Miller sexually assaulted them as children inside churches his family operated. His first wife swore under oath that he admitted to being sexually inappropriate with underage members of his congregation. His father pled guilty to federal charges for trapping international students in forced labor at a Bible college. A forensic psychologist, a psychotherapist, and a retired FBI behavioral analyst have all publicly applied clinical frameworks to this specific case — narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, coercive control, and the DARVO response pattern. This episode walks through the documented evidence and maps it against those frameworks. Then it asks the question domestic violence researchers have studied for decades: what happens when a person who built a system of control inside an institution loses that institution? Miller's church is gone. A global documentary is streaming his alleged conduct. A federal trial is approaching. He's preaching to a handful of people with an ankle monitor on. The research says that's when the profile becomes most dangerous.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #SolidRockChurch #CoerciveControl #TrueCrime #Netflix #MicasLaw #HiddenKillers #JusticeForMica
• 
  The Enablers, the Defense, the DOJ — A Prosecutor on JP Miller's Federal Case 19.09.2026 57мин

  JP Miller's federal cyberstalking case has three fights happening at once. The alleged helpers who are scattering. The defense team building a counter-narrative for October. And the Department of Justice preparing to dismantle all of it in front of a jury. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis takes on each one.Miller was indicted in December 2025 — one count of cyberstalking, one count of making false statements. Prosecutors allege he harassed Mica Miller from November 2022 through her death in April 2024 using tracking devices, over fifty daily contacts, a hired PI, tire damage, financial interference, and an intimate image posted without consent. He allegedly told agents the PI was to protect Mica from purchasing firearms. The government says that was a lie. Miller has pleaded not guilty and denies the allegations. He is not charged in Mica's death, which was ruled a suicide. She was thirty and had filed for divorce two days before. He faces up to seven years. Trial is October 2026.The enablers carry exposure the alleged orchestrator may have avoided — South Carolina's lack of a coercive control law limits state options, but the physical acts leave trails. The defense must convince twelve jurors that GPS trackers equal concern, not control, and must defend a statement to the FBI the government calls a lie. The prosecution has the evidence but needs the jury to feel the weight of living under alleged surveillance for two years — and the open question is whether these charges end the investigation or begin a larger one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #Cyberstalking #DOJ #DeathOfThePastorsWife #EricFaddis #Prosecution
• 
  Lori Vallow Told a Judge WHO Would Free Her From Prison 18.09.2026 14мин

  Lori Vallow Daybell told an Arizona judge that Jesus Christ would free her from prison. She told Keith Morrison on Dateline that she’d be exonerated and might go on Dancing With the Stars afterward. She told the Idaho court at sentencing that no one was murdered. Three juries across two states convicted her. She has never absorbed a single verdict.The Idaho Supreme Court has scheduled her appeal for November 2 in Boise. Her attorney Craig Durham has five constitutional claims, and the strongest involves the removal of her hired lawyer Mark Means over a conflict tied to co-defendant Chad Daybell. The state has a recorded jail call where Chad called Means “my attorney” and documented evidence that Chad arranged and paid for the representation. If the court finds the removal was wrong, the conviction falls without any additional proof of harm.Lori spent 353 days too incompetent to stand trial, moved the case across the state, and then filed a speedy-trial claim over the delay. She represented herself in two Arizona conspiracy trials in 2025, picked up two more life sentences, and is currently housed at the Pocatello Women’s Correctional Center. Even if the Idaho Supreme Court reverses every conviction, the Arizona paper doesn’t move. She’s not leaving.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel.https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!:https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LoriVallow #LoriVallowDaybell #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #IdahoSupremeCourt #ChadDaybell #TyleeRyan #JJVallow #Dateline #TrueCrimePodcast
• 
  Trial Of Caleb Flynn Day 1: K9 Hayes Found WHAT Outside Home? 18.09.2026 29мин

  Did a suspected burglar leave a trail away from the Flynn home? Day 1 testimony put that question directly in front of jurors through a police tracking dog and an FBI neighborhood canvass.Preble County Sheriff’s Deputy David Laycox testified that he responded with K9 Hayes, a dog trained to track human scent.Laycox said Hayes detected a strong scent near the side of the garage and repeatedly wanted to enter that area. He testified that the scent became stronger closer to the garage and home.Hayes also searched the perimeter. Laycox told jurors the dog did not locate a scent trail consistent with someone leaving the scene. Instead, Hayes returned to the stronger scent and again attempted to go inside.Laycox characterized the result as a negative alert for a suspect leaving.The defense used cross-examination to establish what that result cannot say. Laycox agreed that his search did not rule out the possibility that someone left the residence. The dog did not find an outgoing trail, but Laycox did not testify that such a person could not have existed.FBI Agent Michael Tom described a separate effort to locate evidence of a possible burglar.Tom testified that he canvassed the neighborhood and spoke with residents and others nearby to determine whether anyone had seen a suspicious person. He also searched for doorbell-camera footage that could potentially identify someone.According to Tom, nothing was reported during that effort.That testimony goes directly into the competing theories jurors heard during opening statements. Prosecutors allege Caleb Flynn killed his wife, Ashley Flynn, and staged the home as a burglary scene. The defense says Ashley was killed during an actual home invasion and that investigators focused on Caleb too quickly.Caleb has pleaded not guilty. The searches described by Laycox and Tom give jurors evidence about what investigators failed to locate, while cross-examination established the limits of what those failures can prove.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CalebFlynn #AshleyFlynn #TrueCrimeToday #CalebFlynnTrial #K9Hayes #DavidLaycox #MichaelTom #FBIInvestigation #OhioTrial #TrueCrime
• 
  How Federal Prosecutors Plan to Make the Jury Feel What Mica Miller Felt 18.09.2026 15мин

  The DOJ has the receipts. GPS tracking logs, phone records showing fifty-plus contacts in a day, online purchase records for a tire deflation device, a PI contract, and an intimate image allegedly posted without Mica Miller's consent. What prosecutors need now is a jury that doesn't just see the evidence but feels what it meant to be on the receiving end of it for nearly two years.Miller was indicted in December 2025 on federal charges of cyberstalking and making false statements. The alleged harassment ran from November 2022 through Mica's death in April 2024. Prosecutors say Miller told agents the PI was hired to protect Mica from purchasing firearms — a claim the government calls a lie. Miller has pleaded not guilty and denies the allegations. He has not been charged in Mica's death. She was thirty, filed for divorce two days before dying, and her death was ruled a suicide. He faces up to seven years combined. Trial is October 2026.The challenge for the prosecution is translating data into fear. A tracking log is a spreadsheet until a prosecutor makes the jury imagine being watched every time they drive to work. A call log is a column of numbers until twelve people understand what it feels like to have your phone ring fifty times from someone you begged to leave you alone.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony to dissect the prosecution's strategy. The narrative architecture. The plan to preempt victim-blaming. The jury selection strategy in a case this visible. And whether these charges are the government's endgame or its opening move toward something larger.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #DOJ #FederalProsecution #Cyberstalking #DeathOfThePastorsWife #EricFaddis #FederalTrial
• 
  Trial Of Caleb Flynn Day 1: Drone Shows Only WHAT Moving? 18.09.2026 35мин

  A paramedic testified that Ashley Flynn had no pulse by 2:42 a.m. Later, a Tipp City police drone went into the air around the Flynn home — and Officer Hunter Bradburn told jurors what its thermal camera detected moving.Firefighter and paramedic Alex Huels testified that he responded to the Flynn residence and entered the bedroom where Ashley was located.Huels said Ashley was lying on her left side in the bed. A towel was positioned over her head, and he testified that he removed it during his assessment.According to Huels, Ashley had a penetrating head wound, was unmoving, and had no detectable pulse. He testified that his assessment concluded at approximately 2:42 a.m.Officer Hunter Bradburn later testified about documenting the property with a police drone.Bradburn said he took aerial photographs of the Flynn home. During cross-examination, he testified that the drone was deployed at approximately 3:56 a.m. and described the deployment as occurring more than an hour and a half after the incident.Bradburn said the only moving heat signatures he observed at that point were animals.The time gap is important context for jurors evaluating that evidence. Bradburn was describing what the drone detected when it was operating, not what its cameras could establish about the property earlier in the night.Caleb Flynn has pleaded not guilty in the death of his wife, Ashley Flynn. Prosecutors allege he killed Ashley and staged their home to look like the scene of a burglary. His defense says Ashley was killed during a real home invasion and investigators eventually rushed toward Caleb as their suspect.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CalebFlynn #AshleyFlynn #TrueCrimeToday #CalebFlynnTrial #AlexHuels #HunterBradburn #DroneFootage #TippCityPolice #OhioTrial #TrueCrime
• 
  Trial Of Caleb Flynn Day 1: Giampapa Testifies About WHAT in Garage? 18.09.2026 47мин

  An open door leading outside became part of the Day 1 evidence in the Caleb Flynn trial as Tipp City Police Officer Alexandra Giampapa described clearing the home and prosecutors showed jurors her body-camera footage.Giampapa testified that she entered and cleared the garage with another police officer during the February 16, 2026 response to the Flynn residence.While checking that area, she testified that officers discovered a garage door leading to the outside that was open.Giampapa continued through the residence and further cleared the home. She also checked on the minor children who were there while police and emergency personnel responded.EMS later arrived at the residence. Giampapa testified that Ashley Flynn’s mother, Jill, took the children from the home.Prosecutors then played Giampapa’s body-camera footage for the jury, giving them a visual record of part of the police response and the condition officers encountered as they moved through the property.The physical condition of that home matters because Caleb Flynn’s trial presents two sharply different explanations for Ashley Flynn’s death.Prosecutors allege Caleb killed his wife and staged the scene to look like a home-invasion burglary. Caleb has pleaded not guilty, and his defense says the home invasion was real and investigators wrongly focused on him.Giampapa’s testimony did not arrive through later reconstruction of the scene. Jurors were hearing from an officer who participated in the initial clearing of the property while also seeing footage recorded during that response.Day 1 is beginning to establish what officers saw when they entered the Flynn home and what evidence existed before detectives began building either theory of the case.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CalebFlynn #AshleyFlynn #TrueCrimeToday #CalebFlynnTrial #AlexandraGiampapa #BodyCam #TippCityPolice #OhioCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime
• 
  What Mica Miller Documented Before JP Miller's Trial 18.09.2026 20мин

  Before her death on April 27, 2024, Mica Miller filed police reports alleging she was being tracked, harassed, and followed. She told officers she was afraid for her life. She also kept journals. Her family compiled the entries after she died and what they found was devastating—allegations of forced medication, forced injections, and sleep deprivation against her husband, pastor John-Paul "JP" Miller.None of the behavior Mica described to police was a crime in South Carolina. The state's domestic violence laws recognize only physical harm. Federal prosecutors charged JP with cyberstalking and making false statements—texts, a tracking app, and a tire deflation device. He has pleaded not guilty. Maximum sentence: seven years.Mica's Law would make coercive control a felony. It has failed four times in the South Carolina legislature since 2020. JP Miller's federal trial is set for October 2026.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel.https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!:https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #JohnPaulMiller #MicasLaw #CoerciveControl #SolidRockChurch #MyrtleBeach #DeathOfThePastorsWife #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
• 
  Trial Of Caleb Flynn Day 1: First Officer Didn’t Record WHAT? 18.09.2026 47мин

  The prosecution’s first witnesses put timestamps on the opening minutes of the Caleb Flynn case: a 911 call at 2:31 a.m., an officer arriving five minutes later, and an initial conversation with Caleb that jurors will never see on body-camera video.Beth Hull, director of the Miami County Communication Center, was the prosecution’s first witness after the jury reviewed the scene. Hull testified that she retrieved the records and audio from the February 16, 2026 call placed by Caleb Flynn. Prosecutors played that 911 recording in court.Sgt. Corey Rismiller testified that he was the first Tipp City police officer to arrive, reaching the home at approximately 2:36 a.m.Rismiller said he checked the residence for other people and found none. He then went to the bedroom and testified that Ashley Flynn had significant trauma around her head and was deceased. Rismiller secured the scene, notified detectives, and EMS personnel entered afterward.One part of his testimony directly addressed how Caleb was treated during those first minutes. Rismiller testified that he never considered or treated Caleb as a suspect while he was handling the initial response.Then came the body camera.On cross-examination, Rismiller testified that his camera did not activate automatically. He realized it was not recording and manually switched it on. As a result, his first conversation with Caleb Flynn was not captured.The defense also questioned Rismiller about his homicide experience. He testified that he had worked one homicide in Tipp City, sometime in the early 2000s.Caleb Flynn has pleaded not guilty to the charges involving the death of his wife, Ashley Flynn. Prosecutors allege the scene was staged to look like a burglary. The defense maintains that the home invasion actually happened and investigators later rushed toward Caleb as their suspect.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CalebFlynn #AshleyFlynn #TrueCrimeToday #CalebFlynnTrial #CoreyRismiller #BethHull #911Call #TippCityPolice #OhioTrial #TrueCrime
• 
  Trial Of Caleb Flynn Day 1: Emily Smith Concedes WHAT to Jurors? 18.09.2026 21мин

  Caleb Flynn’s defense opened its case to the jury with an unusual choice: acknowledge the affair, acknowledge the lie, and then tell jurors those facts do not make him a murderer.Defense attorney Emily Smith delivered that message after Miami County Prosecuting Attorney Paul Watkins presented the prosecution’s opening statement in the trial over the death of Caleb’s wife, Ashley Flynn.Caleb Flynn, 40, has pleaded not guilty to 11 charges, including aggravated murder. Prosecutors allege Ashley, 37, was killed inside the couple’s Tipp City home on February 16, 2026, and that Caleb carefully staged the scene to resemble a home-invasion burglary.The defense says investigators got it wrong. Smith maintains that Ashley was actually killed during a burglary and that authorities focused on Caleb too quickly.Smith also addressed something the defense apparently does not intend to spend time pretending never happened: Caleb had an affair and lied about it. Her message to the jury was blunt: “A man can fail as a husband without being a murderer.”Legally, that distinction matters. Jurors may hear evidence they find ugly, dishonest, or personally offensive. None of those reactions can replace the state’s burden to prove the charged crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. Smith’s opening made clear that the defense wants jurors separating Caleb Flynn’s conduct within his marriage from the question of whether prosecutors can prove he killed Ashley.Watkins, meanwhile, began outlining the prosecution’s version of what happened inside that home and why the state believes Caleb is responsible.Judge Jeannine Pratt also gave the jury its instructions, setting the rules for how jurors are expected to evaluate what comes next.The lawyers have now told jurors what they believe the evidence will show. The testimony and exhibits get the final word.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodContent on this site is based on publicly available information and reflects commentary and opinion. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Nothing published here constitutes legal, medical, or professional advice.#CalebFlynn #AshleyFlynn #TrueCrimeToday #CalebFlynnTrial #OpeningStatements #OhioCourt #MurderTrial #EmilySmith #PaulWatkins #TrueCrime