Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

Episoade

• 
  JP Miller Claims Tracking Mica Was 'Protection' — The Feds Charged Him 17.09.2026 18min

  Federal prosecutors say JP Miller didn't deny tracking Mica Miller. They say he justified it. According to the charging documents, he told agents the surveillance was about protecting his estranged wife — from herself. The federal government charged him with cyberstalking.Miller was indicted in December 2025 on two counts — cyberstalking and making false statements to federal investigators. The allegations cover November 2022 through Mica's death in April 2024. Prosecutors describe tracking devices, over fifty contacts in a day, financial interference, tire damage, and an intimate image posted without consent. Miller allegedly hired a private investigator and told agents it was to prevent Mica from buying firearms. Miller pleaded not guilty. He denies the allegations and is not charged in Mica's death.Mica was thirty. She filed for divorce two days before dying. Her death was ruled a suicide. The federal trial has been pushed to October 2026 after multiple continuances.Mica told police she was being tracked. She reported it. She asked for help. While she was reportedly in a mental health facility, her devices were allegedly taken. Nobody in a position of authority allegedly intervened on her behalf.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony live to dissect what clinicians call "carewashing" — how surveillance allegedly gets reframed as concern, why institutions accept it, and what the federal case says about the gap between protecting someone and controlling every part of her life.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Carewashing #Cyberstalking #FederalTrial #NarcissisticAbuse #ShavaunScott
• 
  Why JP Miller's Inner Circle Is Running Now That the Feds Are Watching 17.09.2026 26min

  Seven hundred members once filled Solid Rock Church in Myrtle Beach. Fifteen remain. The property has been sold for $2.1 million. The building is slated for demolition. And the people who once stood next to JP Miller every Sunday are now claiming they were never that close.Miller faces federal charges of cyberstalking and making false statements to investigators, stemming from allegations that he harassed his estranged wife Mica Miller from November 2022 through her death in April 2024. The federal indictment details tracking devices, more than fifty daily contacts, financial interference, and an intimate image allegedly posted without consent. Miller has pleaded not guilty and denies the allegations. He is not charged in Mica's death, which was ruled a suicide. She was thirty years old and had filed for divorce two days prior. Trial is scheduled for October 2026.Court filings describe congregation members who allegedly helped carry out the harassment Mica reported to police. None of them face charges. And now, with the Netflix docuseries "Death of the Pastor's Wife" reaching tens of millions of viewers, they are gone.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony live to examine the clinical framework behind enabler behavior — why people in a controller's orbit allegedly participate, why they stay quiet while the target begs for help, and what triggers the stampede once institutions finally respond. The inner circle didn't scatter when Mica asked for help. They scattered when the FBI did.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #DeathOfThePastorsWife #SolidRockChurch #FlyingMonkeys #Enablers #Cyberstalking #ShavaunScott
• 
  Lindsay Clancy's Mistrial Proved THIS About How We Handle Maternal Mental Illness 17.09.2026 1h 10min

  The Lindsay Clancy murder trial ended with an 11-to-1 split, a mistrial, and a system that reportedly had no tools to prevent the outcome. One holdout juror allegedly admitted reasonable doubt and refused to apply the court's instructions. Seven weeks of testimony, over 80 witnesses, and 38 hours of deliberation were erased on September 4.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins the show to analyze the full scope of what the mistrial exposed. He starts with the jury room — what jurors have publicly described about the holdout's conduct, why the defense's emergency appeal to the Massachusetts SJC was denied, and what the legal system's inability to act reveals about how well-equipped it is to handle cases built on psychiatric evidence.Motta moves to the legal maneuvering that followed. Reddington filed a Rule 25 motion on September 10, arguing the mistrial was not a manifest necessity and seeking an acquittal finding before the state can retry. The hearing is September 29. Reddington has publicly stated he won't accept prison time in any deal. Cruz has said only that his office will address the case at the appropriate time. Motta examines the power dynamic and where a realistic resolution might fall.The conversation closes on the question the system is avoiding. Lindsay is reportedly paralyzed at Tewksbury State Hospital on suicide watch. Patrick Clancy faces the prospect of another extended trial. Eleven jurors reportedly accepted Dr. Resnick's testimony that Lindsay's psychotic state, not malice, drove her actions. Motta addresses whether the first-degree murder framework can process this kind of case — and what continued prosecution signals about the system's treatment of maternal mental illness.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyMistrial #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #KevinReddington #TimCruz #Retrial #MaternalMentalHealth #TrueCrime
• 
  Lindsay Clancy Retrial Serves THIS Purpose — and No One Wants to Say It 16.09.2026 16min

  The Lindsay Clancy mistrial reset the clock on a case that had already put Patrick Clancy, the families, and the public through seven weeks of devastating testimony. A retrial means all of it happens again — the 911 audio, the expert psychiatric analysis, the clinical descriptions of what happened to Cora, Dawson, and Callan — in front of a new jury that knows the last one split 11 to 1 against the prosecution.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins the show to analyze what a second trial actually accomplishes. Lindsay Clancy is reportedly paralyzed and confined at Tewksbury State Hospital on suicide watch. Motta examines the practical difference between her current confinement in a secure psychiatric facility and a prison sentence — and whether that difference is large enough to justify the toll of another extended trial.Motta also addresses the systemic failure this case exposes. Dr. Resnick's testimony at trial explained altruistic filicide — how severe postpartum psychosis can produce actions rooted in delusional protective impulses rather than criminal intent. Eleven jurors reportedly accepted that framework. The first-degree murder statute offers no graduated response for cases where the defendant's actions originated in a documented psychiatric crisis.The conversation ends where the system doesn't want to go. If the state retries this case and loses, the prosecution spent enormous resources proving what 11 jurors already concluded. If the state retries and wins, the question is whether incarcerating a paralyzed, severely mentally ill woman in a prison instead of a psychiatric hospital serves anything beyond a conviction statistic. Motta addresses who a retrial is actually for — and what it tells the mothers who saw their own postpartum struggles reflected in this trial.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #Retrial #PostpartumPsychosis #MaternalMentalHealth #BobMotta #TrueCrime #Tewksbury #AltruisticFilicide
• 
  Lindsay Clancy's Attorney Believes THIS Ends It Before a Retrial 16.09.2026 11min

  Kevin Reddington moved within days of the mistrial. The Rule 25 motion he filed on September 10 asks Judge Sullivan to enter a finding of Not Guilty by Reason of Lack of Criminal Responsibility — an acquittal that would prevent the state from retrying Lindsay Clancy. The hearing is September 29.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins the show to analyze the legal and strategic logic behind Reddington's approach. The motion's core argument: the holdout juror reportedly admitted reasonable doubt but refused to apply the court's instructions, which means the mistrial may not have been a "manifest necessity" — a legal finding that, if Sullivan agrees, would bar retrial under double jeopardy protections. Motta explains why legal analysts have called this a long shot but also why Reddington's argument has real weight given the juror conduct multiple panel members have now described publicly.Motta also examines the power dynamic between Reddington and DA Tim Cruz heading into September 29. The 11-to-1 split gives the defense leverage the prosecution didn't expect. Reddington has been publicly aggressive — telling reporters he "crushed" the prosecution, then telling CNN he'd hear what Cruz has to say but won't agree to incarceration. Cruz has said only that his team will address the case "at the appropriate time."The prosecution's trial theory — that Lindsay staged her suicide attempt while arguing she killed because she wanted to die — was reportedly rejected by the overwhelming majority of the jury. Motta walks through whether the state can survive a retrial with the same approach, whether reduced charges and a bench trial represent a more viable path, and what Reddington's public maneuvering tells us about where this case is actually headed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyCase #HiddenKillers #KevinReddington #TimCruz #Rule25 #PleaDeal #Mistrial #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta
• 
  Lindsay Clancy's Juror Refused to Do THIS Despite Admitting Doubt 16.09.2026 42min

  The Lindsay Clancy jury split 11 to 1 in favor of acquittal by reason of insanity. The holdout reportedly acknowledged he had reasonable doubt about Clancy's criminal responsibility. Then he allegedly refused to apply the legal standard the court instructed him to follow — collapsing seven weeks of trial into a mistrial on September 4.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins the show to analyze the behavioral and legal dimensions of what happened inside that deliberation room. Multiple jurors have now spoken publicly, describing a holdout who wouldn't review the medical or toxicology evidence, reportedly spent time scrolling his phone during deliberations, and when pressed for any evidentiary basis for his position, allegedly had none.Motta examines what drove a juror to acknowledge doubt and still refuse the verdict that doubt required — whether this reflects a bias against mental illness defenses, a refusal to accept postpartum psychosis as a legitimate medical condition, or something else entirely. He walks through the legal constraints Judge Sullivan faced, why Reddington's emergency appeal to the Massachusetts SJC was denied, and what the defense's argument that this juror showed bias rather than legitimate disagreement actually means under the law.Looking ahead, Motta breaks down the voir dire challenge if this case goes to retrial. In a prosecution where the sole contested issue was whether severe postpartum psychosis negated criminal responsibility, both sides face the problem of identifying prospective jurors whose personal beliefs about mental illness would prevent them from following the court's instructions — and the legal system's limited tools for catching that before it derails another trial.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #Mistrial #HoldoutJuror #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #KevinReddington #JurySystem #TrueCrime
• 
  JP Miller, Clancy's Holdout, and D4vd's Mother—Who Is Worse?! 16.09.2026 1h 3min

  A pastor who allegedly terrorized his wife and preached at her memorial. A juror who admitted reasonable doubt and refused to acquit. A mother named in a lawsuit alleging she helped conceal what was happening around her son. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke puts all three under the behavioral microscope.JP Miller faces federal cyberstalking charges in connection with his alleged treatment of Mica Miller. He has pleaded not guilty. Mica was found dead at a North Carolina state park on April 27, 2024. Her death was ruled a suicide. The congregation at Solid Rock Church allegedly sided with JP while Mica was pushed out of the community she had given her life to.The Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court ended in a hung jury, 11-to-1. Jurors are now speaking publicly. The foreperson says the holdout admitted he had reasonable doubt and still refused to vote for acquittal. Other jurors described leaving the courthouse sick and crying every night after listening to testimony about the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan.The family of Celeste Rivas Hernandez filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Los Angeles against D4vd, his mother Colleen Burke, his managers, and his business entities. The complaint alleges an inner circle that knew about the relationship with a minor and helped maintain it. David Burke has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and other charges.Dreeke breaks down the psychology of each figure and asks who poses the greatest danger going forward.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #LindsayClancy #D4vd #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #JPMiller #CelesteRivasHernandez #CoerciveControl #HungJury #TrueCrimePodcast
• 
  D4vd's Celebrity Lawyers Quit After WHAT Was Filed?! 15.09.2026 20min

  Blair Berk and Marilyn Bednarski represented some of the most high-profile defendants in entertainment law. They took D4vd's murder case. Then they quit.The withdrawal came weeks before the family of Celeste Rivas Hernandez filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court naming not just David Anthony Burke, but his mother Colleen Burke, his managers, his recording company, and his publishing company. The complaint alleges a system of enablement: company funds allegedly used to pay for housing and security, a bodyguard who allegedly transported a minor, and managers who the family says knew what was happening.Burke was determined to qualify for a public defender. Walid Kandeel of the LA County Public Defender's Office now represents him. Burke pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder, continuous illegal conduct involving a person under 14, and mutilation of remains. The DA's office says the death penalty remains on the table.Celeste Rivas Hernandez's remains were found in the trunk of Burke's Tesla at a Hollywood impound lot in September 2025. She was 14. Prosecutors allege she was killed after she threatened to come forward about the relationship. Text messages presented at the preliminary hearing allegedly showed she had become pregnant and undergone a procedure.Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke examines what it signals when elite defense attorneys walk away from a paying client, the psychology of an inner circle under legal pressure, and what the civil discovery process could force into the open.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #HiddenKillers #DavidBurke #RobinDreeke #CivilLawsuit #ColleenBurke #LosAngeles #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
• 
  What Was JP Miller Thinking at Mica's Memorial?! 15.09.2026 30min

  JP Miller stood at the pulpit of Solid Rock Church and preached at the memorial service for his estranged wife, Mica Miller. Witnesses described his language as possessive. He spoke about her body. He centered the moment around himself. For the people who had spent months watching Mica report harassment and beg for help, the performance was the final confirmation.Mica Miller died on April 27, 2024, at a North Carolina state park. Her death was ruled a suicide. She was 30 years old. She had served JP with divorce papers two days before. In the months leading up to her death, she filed police reports describing GPS tracking, razor blades in her tires, and a pattern of behavior she called coercive control.Federal prosecutors charged JP Miller with cyberstalking and making false statements to investigators. The indictment alleges a harassment campaign that lasted from November 2022 until her death. He has pleaded not guilty.Mica's family says the congregation at Solid Rock Church closed ranks around JP while Mica was systematically pushed out. The people who should have been her support system became part of the cage.Former FBI Special Agent and behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke breaks down what a memorial performance like that reveals about the person delivering it, how narcissistic control works inside tight-knit communities, and what the behavioral evidence tells us about what Mica was living through.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #HiddenKillers #CoerciveControl #RobinDreeke #SolidRockChurch #DeathOfThePastorsWife #MicasLaw #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
• 
  JP Miller and D4vd Both Had THIS Protecting Them 15.09.2026 58min

  JP Miller and D4vd interview — two men whose alleged conduct spans different states and industries. What they share, according to former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer, is the alleged infrastructure that let it continue.JP Miller goes to federal trial in October 2026 on cyberstalking and false statements charges. The indictment alleges a campaign against Mica Miller from November 2022 through her death on April 27, 2024 — surveillance, a tire deflation device, over fifty calls in one day, and an intimate image distributed without consent. Before any of it, Miller positioned himself as the authority in Mica's life.The family of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez filed a twelve-count wrongful death lawsuit against D4vd and the people closest to him.Coffindaffer breaks down what happens when enablers face their own reckoning.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBI #TrueCrime #WrongfulDeath #CoerciveControl
• 
  D4vd's Inner Circle Just Got Sued for THIS 14.09.2026 24min

  D4vd inner circle lawsuit — the family of Celeste Rivas Hernandez did not limit their civil action to the musician. They went after the adults who allegedly watched it happen.The wrongful death lawsuit, filed September 8, 2026, names Colleen Burke, manager Josh Marshall, security guard Sheldon Jacques, and business entities. Twelve causes of action. The family alleges these adults knew or should have known what was happening to a fourteen-year-old and failed to act.Burke's former financial manager testified to earnings exceeding ten million dollars. Weeks after Celeste's remains were discovered, Burke transferred two Texas homes to his mother to shield assets. He now uses a public defender and is held without bail.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer analyzes what happens when the inner circle faces its own legal reckoning.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #WrongfulDeath #Lawsuit #JusticeForCeleste #DavidBurke #Murder #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers
• 
  JP Miller Did WHAT at Mica's First Wedding?! 14.09.2026 13min

  JP Miller pastor case — he stood at the altar and officiated her wedding to another man. Years later, she was caring for his children. Then she was his wife.Mica was a teenager when she joined JP's youth ministry at Solid Rock Church. JP was fifteen years older. He officiated her marriage to Jeremy. After it ended, she became his employee. In 2015, he confessed to an affair with Mica from his pulpit. She was twenty. He was thirty-five. Both marriages ended. JP set the wedding terms. They wed in November 2017.Mica was thirty when she died on April 27, 2024. JP Miller faces federal cyberstalking and false statements charges. Trial is set for October 2026.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines how institutional authority gets weaponized.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #CoerciveControl #SolidRockChurch #Pastor #RedFlags #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime
• 
  What JP Miller Allegedly Put on the Internet About Mica 14.09.2026 20min

  JP Miller Mica Miller interview — the former Myrtle Beach pastor faces federal trial in October 2026 on cyberstalking and false statements charges. Netflix's Death of the Pastor's Wife has the world watching.Prosecutors allege Miller carried out a campaign against Mica from November 2022 until her death on April 27, 2024 — a hired PI, a tire deflation device on her car, over fifty calls in one day, and an intimate image posted online without consent.Mica reported the harassment to Horry County police. The case stalled. The Robeson County Sheriff's Office requested federal involvement.Miller pleaded not guilty and posted bond. He faces up to seven years in prison.Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down the FBI's involvement and the alleged coercive control campaign.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreekeThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JPMiller #MicaMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #Netflix #FBI #Cyberstalking #FederalTrial #SolidRockChurch #MyrtleBeach #TrueCrime
• 
  Tim Cruz Chose THESE Words After Lindsay Clancy’s Mistrial 14.09.2026 32min

  The Lindsay Clancy jury could not reach a verdict, but Kevin Reddington says the split was 11-1 for acquittal. Minutes after the mistrial, Plymouth County DA Tim Cruz defended the case and described the deaths as the “cruel and calculated killing of three innocents.” That contrast is where the next fight begins. Judge William Sullivan ended the trial September 4 after more than 38 hours of deliberation over seven days. The defense argued Clancy was experiencing postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible. The Commonwealth argued the evidence showed planning, awareness, and control. Cruz said the evidence suggested to his office that Clancy remained in control of her actions. Eric Faddis, a defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins Tony Brueski to examine the choices available after a mistrial like this. Prosecutors can retry the same theory, adjust the way the case is presented, reconsider charges, explore a plea, or decide another trial will not produce a better result. Faddis also looks at how much weight an office should give a reported 11-1 split when jurors never returned a unanimous verdict. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins the conversation from a different direction. She looks at why the Clancy case has become so personal for viewers and why postpartum psychosis is being argued as a moral identity question instead of only a medical and legal issue. Her focus is on what that atmosphere communicates to parents who may already be frightened by their own thoughts and symptoms. Patrick Clancy’s lawyer has described another trial as extraordinarily painful for Patrick and his family. Cruz has not announced a retrial decision. With a September 29 court date scheduled, the prosecution has to decide what justice looks like after a jury reportedly came within one vote of acquittal. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #TimCruz #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #Mistrial #Retrial #CriminalJustice #TrueCrimeLive 
• 
  Lindsay Clancy’s Foreperson Flagged WHAT in the Jury Room?! 13.09.2026 42min

  The Lindsay Clancy mistrial came after a jury-room complaint that raised a harder question than ordinary disagreement. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington said the foreperson identified a juror who had acknowledged doubt but was refusing to apply the court’s reasonable-doubt instruction to the verdict. Judge William Sullivan did not remove the juror. He questioned jurors about whether they could follow his legal instructions, reminded them of the reasonable-doubt standard, and sent them back to deliberate. The panel still could not reach a unanimous verdict, and Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4 after seven days of deliberations. Then the conflict moved outside the courthouse. Patrick Clancy’s attorney Howard Cooper issued a September 8 statement condemning online claims that Patrick was involved in the deaths of his children, warning of possible legal consequences, and confirming that law enforcement had been notified. Former FBI counterintelligence behavioral expert Robin Dreeke joins Tony Brueski to look at the human mechanics of a pressured group. He examines what happens when eleven people believe the twelfth is not reasoning from the same rules, without turning limited information into a diagnosis of motive. Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis handles the legal mechanics, including the narrow circumstances for questioning a juror and the protections surrounding deliberations. Eric also breaks down the defamation fight around Patrick: what lawyers would need to prove, how anonymous creators can become identifiable in litigation, and why notifying police is different from proving a crime occurred. The September 29 hearing sits at the intersection of a mistrial, a possible retrial, and an online fallout that has developed its own legal consequences. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #HoldoutJuror #Mistrial #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #Defamation #JuryRoom #TrueCrimeLive 
• 
  Lindsay Clancy's Defense Won't Accept WHAT Deal?! 13.09.2026 37min

  Lindsay Clancy's mistrial has turned into a public legal chess match, and Kevin Reddington just added President Donald Trump to it. He asked for a pardon even though presidential clemency does not apply to Massachusetts state charges, then explained that he hoped outside attention could help influence how the local case is resolved. The move comes after Reddington spent the final stretch of trial attacking the Commonwealth's treatment of Clancy's injuries. Medical testimony described the neck and wrist wounds as superficial, but the second-story fall caused a spinal injury and paralysis. Reddington said prosecutors had tried to use the wound evidence to argue that Clancy's attempt on her own life was fake. The jury deliberated for roughly 38 hours over seven days before Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4. Reddington has characterized the split as 11-1 for acquittal based on lack of criminal responsibility, and jurors who later spoke publicly described the same basic divide. District Attorney Timothy Cruz has not announced a retrial decision. An emergency Supreme Judicial Court bid over the holdout juror failed, and a spectator was arrested after allegedly filming jurors outside the courthouse. A presidential request may dominate the headline, but the next enforceable move belongs in Plymouth Superior Court. The September 29 proceeding is set for status, trial assignment, and the defense's Rule 25 request for a required finding of not guilty. That motion asks Sullivan to decide whether the Commonwealth's proof was legally sufficient, rather than asking him to choose which psychiatric experts he personally believed. Bob Motta of Defense Diaries and defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis join Tony Brueski to separate courtroom leverage from public leverage. They examine the injury argument, the reported 11-1 split, the renewed Rule 25 fight, and Reddington's public refusal to accept a deal requiring jail time. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillersLive #BobMotta #EricFaddis #Mistrial #Rule25Motion #ClancyCase #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeLive
• 
  Donna & Wendi Adelson: What Donna Allegedly Wrote in Jail 13.09.2026 45min

  Donna Adelson's Dan Markel murder trial produced a handwritten script that prosecutors said was designed to manufacture testimony against Katherine Magbanua. Drina Bernhardt testified that Donna wrote the question-and-answer material for her to study and repeat in court, and an FDLE handwriting analyst testified that Donna was the writer. Bernhardt said Donna offered $10,000 and a grand piano as part of the arrangement. The defense challenged Bernhardt's motives, criminal exposure, and account of how the writing happened. Jurors also heard from another jailhouse witness who claimed Donna admitted involvement in Markel's murder, an accusation Donna's lawyers contested. The financial evidence gave jurors another fight to resolve. Prosecutors pointed to 44 checks Donna signed to Katherine Magbanua after the murder and argued they were tied to the plot. The defense said Donna signed the checks because Charlie told her he was being extorted and she believed him. One week after Charlie's 2023 conviction, authorities arrested Donna at Miami International Airport as she and Harvey prepared to travel to Vietnam on one-way tickets. Wendi Adelson's section of the case carries a different kind of dispute. Jeffrey Lacasse testified that five days before Markel was shot, Wendi told him Charlie had explored "all options" for the "Danny Markel problem," including hiring a hitman for about $15,000. Wendi testified that she did not recall the conversation and denied saying it. Lacasse also said Wendi questioned him about his planned Friday drive and route in the days before the murder, then asked him not to contact her for a week. Wendi was home for a Geek Squad repair on the television tied to Charlie's hitman joke and denied that the TV was code. Donna was later convicted on all three counts, while Wendi remains uncharged. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #DanMarkel #DonnaAdelson #HiddenKillersLive #WendiAdelson #JeffreyLacasse #AdelsonCase #MurderForHire #CourtroomTestimony #Tallahassee #TrueCrimeLive 
• 
  Nick Reiner and Lindsay Clancy: Alike - or NOT?! 13.09.2026 46min

  Nick Reiner and Lindsay Clancy are being compared in the same online conversations because addiction, psychosis, and criminal responsibility are emotionally loaded words. The facts behind the two cases force a harder comparison than the internet usually allows. Reiner is accused of killing his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner, in their Brentwood home. He has pleaded not guilty. A grand jury indictment adds a lying-in-wait special circumstance, an allegation prosecutors will have to prove if the case reaches trial. Long before the charges, Reiner publicly discussed repeated treatment for addiction, homelessness in several states, relapse, and an episode in which he wrecked his parents' guest house while using drugs. Clancy's defense did not dispute that she caused the deaths of her children. The trial question was whether postpartum psychosis left her legally unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions. Prosecutors said she remained criminally responsible. The first jury never reached a verdict, and several jurors later said eleven of them favored a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity. Those distinctions have not kept the argument inside a courtroom. A TikTok creator claimed a disagreement over Clancy led him to cancel a $200,000 wedding, and he described his fiancee as a monster because of her view of the case. The viral reaction showed how quickly a legal disagreement can become a verdict on another person's character. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski to examine the psychology underneath that reaction. They look at why people treat addiction and psychosis as if they carry the same information about choice. They also examine why compassion is often mistaken for excusing conduct, and why true-crime audiences can start judging each other more aggressively than they judge the evidence. Reiner's next hearing is set for September 15. Clancy's case remains active after the September 4 mistrial. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NickReiner #LindsayClancy #HiddenKillersLive #ShavaunScott #RobReiner #Addiction #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #Mistrial #Nightbird 
• 
  Lindsay Clancy's Lawyer Said WHAT About Patrick Rumors?! 13.09.2026 27min

  Lindsay Clancy's attorney was asked to address conspiracy theories accusing Patrick Clancy after the September 4 mistrial. Kevin Reddington said he had not accused Patrick, then said he did not dismiss internet investigators and praised the ability of TikTok and Instagram users to ferret out facts. Four days later, Patrick's attorney said law enforcement had been notified about what he called a destructive defamation campaign. Patrick was not a defendant in this case. He was the Commonwealth's first witness. He testified about Lindsay's mental-health decline, the night their children died and the 911 call he made after returning home. Lindsay's defense did not contest that she killed Cora, Dawson and Callan; it argued that severe mental illness left her without criminal responsibility. No public evidence has established that Patrick participated in the deaths. The online case against him has instead been built from grief, appearance and personal choices. His relocation to New York became suspicious to some users. His remarriage became suspicious. His public forgiveness of Lindsay became suspicious. Even the way he testified became material for people trying to decide whether he looked like the kind of father they expected to see. Tony Brueski, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott pull apart that process from two directions. Dreeke looks at how choosing a suspect first can make ordinary behavior look like supposed evidence. Scott examines why people impose rigid scripts on grief and punish survivors who do not perform pain in the expected way. Reddington's words and Cooper's warning now sit on opposite sides of the same online storm. How much responsibility comes with feeding curiosity when real people are absorbing the consequences? Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #TrueCrime #KevinReddington #ConspiracyTheories #Mistrial #Grief 
• 
  Anna Kepner Case: What Shauntel Asked a Judge to Change 12.09.2026 50min

  Anna Kepner’s case is heading toward a federal trial while the family around Timothy Hudson is still fighting in a separate courtroom. Shauntel Hudson is Timothy’s mother and Anna’s stepmother. She has asked a judge to enforce and recalculate child support against her ex-husband, Thomas Hudson. Shauntel’s filing says the support order started at $2,129 per month for three children and later dropped as fewer children remained covered. She says Thomas failed to pay for several months and argues the current amount should be revisited because she believes his earnings are higher. Thomas disputes both points, and the child-support petition is still pending. A federal filing explains why this family dispute carries more weight than an ordinary support argument. Timothy’s defense says it cannot finish important preparation because access to certain relatives has been limited. His lawyers are gathering information for a Miller hearing, a proceeding that requires a judge to examine a juvenile defendant’s background before life without parole can be imposed. The defense compared that work to the detailed personal-history investigation used in the sentencing phase of a capital case. Judge Beth Bloom granted the defense request for additional time after prosecutors did not object. The trial is scheduled for November 2, 2026, and any plea agreement is due by October 23. Timothy, who was 16 when Anna died, has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and a second serious federal charge. The defense says family access matters to its preparation. The civil docket shows the same family arguing over payments and past parenting arrangements while Timothy remains in federal custody. By November, those separate fights may collide in one practical question: who will give the defense the history it says the federal judge may need? Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #HiddenKillersLive #ShauntelHudson #ThomasHudson #CarnivalHorizon #FederalTrial #MillerHearing #CruiseShipCase #TrueCrime